# Projects Code | Support | Contact GPG/PGP # Index
DEFCON



"#ExpectUs"

[org: 18/05/2019] [rev: 18/05/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."In summary..."

"When feudalist slavery was abolished, there was also an increase in social conflictivity. It is what has to abolish privileges"...



"The corrupt, fear us. The honest, support us. The heroic, join us."

[org: 07/05/2019] [rev: 09/05/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."In the path of saving work to others... on the pragmatic but also on the more massive as possible survival plan... way"...

A list ordered about classical Anarchism:
  1. Each individual has jurisdiction over their own body
  2. Does not permit or justify aggresively coercive authority in the conduct of relations between individuals
  3. Rejects the state as it is an inherently harmful institution that claims monopoly on the use of force
  4. Does not demand that the individual conform to society, rather than society should conform to the individual
  5. Acknowledges that each individual has the natural right to defend themselves, their community, and their justly acquired property from aggression
  6. Ensure tolerance of all peaceful voluntary exchanges between individuals, and acknowledges that theft, taxation, and expropiation are inherently aggresive
  7. Is not about chaos but rather the absence of the state and centralised political authority



How to use the truth?

[org: 04/05/2019] [rev: 19/05/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."In the age of lies and fake news"...

Imagine that you could change the value of things. Suddenly, things for which you have paid £10, its real value is actually 2000 years. Try to hold that power for a while. Use your lateral thinking ability. Imagine that you can base what you have on other parameters different from their cost in the market, for example, others looking at conditions more related to the environmental balance. Use the ecological footprint for this mental game. Or the cost in time. Now, look around you. Imagine that you change that prism. What do you have?. Now, imagine that everyone does it. What do you see?. Do you have a plan for when you have fulfilled your plan?... The objects are what we project that we want them to be. An object is, but it can also be. It is whoever perceives the object that projects its function. Just as the Impressionists conceive art. A hammer is only a tool. And a tool grants a power. Power corrupts. Power has a cost. A responsibility. A hammer is worth its ecological footprint, plus the responsibility of whoever uses it and to use it. Now, think on weapons. Or the Internet. Or think in money, itself. Each object is a compendium of truths. The rest is a matter of learning to use them... "We are not anyone's tools. You are your own tool. The tool is not the end. And the truth but also the opposite of the truth, are just tools. The truth is not the end, but it is a way. No one governs the truth but some are closer than others. The truth is learned. A single truth can contain lies. If the truth does not exist, it governs the lie. The only truth is its non-existence. And, the objects always tell the truth"...



What happens with Capitalism? (I)

[org: 18/05/2019] [rev: 20/05/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."Being very brief, without exposing pragmatic ideas, plans, actions, etc... and trying not to go too deeply into extensive debates, or that have already been exposed by others and in several ways... but rather, contributing to basic fundamental concepts and explaining the differences in some common errors"...

So, What happens with Capitalism?... With Capitalism happens that: "if something is -gratis- and it is not -libre-, you are the product!". Also happens that: "there are only two possible role-players in this game, "slave" and "master", and another has already chosen before you"... From my point of view, there is an important argument when we talk about Capitalism that we shouldn't easily discard and is that: "to abolish Capitalism is not the end". At least, if we try to think about it, from the anarchist perspective and without falling into some common confussion, which is generally related with having only access to the theory and the lack of practice. We can use a practical situation as an example. You are talking with a (neo)Liberal/Capitalist, who openly supports financial or mercantilist capitalism putting into risk important pilars of your own ideology, and suddenly you realize you feel really confused noticing that some of the practices are very similar. For example, the idea of a "free market". Moreover, both ideologies have in common that they do not want the figure of a centralized government. Here is where the debate is usually stopped and some people heads already exploded, normally falling into the fallacy of thinking that: "opposed ideologies are finally equal". I think that nobody clearly says, at least from the anarchist perspective that, although we have apparently similar economic purposes and we can share some theories/practices with other ideologies, including the ones seemingly antagonistic, what differentiates us fundamentaly from them is the future plan we follow to achieve it. And of course, the methods used to achieve it. In fact, the Liberalism theory generally wants to remove the state so that it stops regulating minimum wages, controlling inflation, etc... ending the social and working regulations to protect the workers. Anarchists should take care about "only" wanting to remove the state, if the economic system used after that has no changed. Because then, the level of slavery generated by a purely technocratic system can be infinitely worst... There are people who do not differentiate a Liberal from an Anarcho-capitalist, however there are many differences. For example, although Anarcho-capitalists are also governed by the supply and demand law, in theory, they are willing to put in place mechanisms to avoid the concentration of wealth, since this generates hierarchies. It is rare, therefore, to see Anarcho-capitalists organizing themselves with the rigid structures "from top to bottom", with which the capitalists are usually organized. On the other hand, there are also from the schools of Anarchy, the Anarcho-collectivists, who use another form of Capitalism for their economic system, but in its more social version. Such as ones that try to share barter or surplus between the community, trying to provide similar development opportunities for each human being. These groups are those that generally promote a Universal Basic Income for each human being, in the case of the almost completion of the increasing automation process. Of course, they are in favor of executing interventionist policies, as opposed to free-market ideas. Therefore, they are practically opposed to Anarcho-capitalists, since they will try to impose as few control measures as possible on the flow of people, goods and services, except when strictly necessary to avoid situations of oligopoly or monopoly... In conclusion: "I think that upcoming Capitalism will be 'The Gamificated Global Society of Roles & Rules' which will probably be implemented using a more "Eco-" or more "Green-" justification, but Capitalism anyway. With the threat to become a much darker system for workers and where to loose freedoms we have already been fought for. As with earth's human overpopulation, that can imply another new system of slavery for every individual mind and body, in which the subsistence will look collective, but the struggle for survival will remain individual, as ever. So again, everything will change but to remain the same"...



What means 'ethics' for you?

[org: 16/05/2019] [rev: 17/05/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."After Niestzche... without falling into the Nihilism of some schools from classical Anarchism... and being close to the reciever as much as possible"...

Once, at the end of a conference on computer security... at a University in Catalonia, and with the contextual presence of some famous antivirus software companies and other security IT related companies, even sharing the stage, in which they disguise some of their products as techniques or science and try to sell them to the rest of the scientifics-Community, sometimes including a subliminal marketing way... A talk which alluded to certain aspects of the "ethical hacking", questioning its use and how, including the term, has been appropriated, like other symbols and methodologies, from Anarcha/Hacker cultures and from other sub-cultures that have merged from them, or that have gone evolving in parallel to them, like for example, those movements directly related with Transhumanism/Cyboring, or some interesting Malthusianism dilemmas, or even several sci-fi distopic ideas, etc... A common trought in which a possible goal to reach by the governments and several companies, is not only pushing societies into keep a global slavery system going on, but also to build; "a non-directly scary but directly 'smart', apparently futuristic but with an old selfish background, unique point of view for all ideas, technologies and things". A system, for the mind. Ones with an unique rule that goes about only applying cosmetic changes and empty policies to society, every some time, so that "everything changes, but remains the same"... Including also, security industry business, in which for example, some companies are hiddenly selling software to governments and Military Departments from different countries, which is used to deploy massively surveillance systems on an efficient way, and sometimes even including a "defensive related argument" with the implementation that always has some kind of priority attached, of course, required by one of the multiple National Security Departments running, and probably in the form of a public message, that tries to justify a need of resources but using any interesting related task, as an excuse. And that excuse will be fundamentally based and focused into exploit several of the human primary emotional conditions, as for example, fear. So, simply saying that it is an important tool to be used on "war against terrorism" and that the best for the population, in that case, will be to sacrify some of their liberties to apparently have more security, it is done. An Orwellian system that always ends being used against the citizens, even that is paid by them from their taxes and that, from a pragmatic point of view, who never contributes to decrease some criminality statistics, or to increase some citizens safety perceptions markers, on the real life, almost for the poor. A methodology which is used against the citizens but also against possible subversive ideas generated and shared, for/by them. Something that is very typical of totalitarian regimes. And this is done by security companies or companies that contribute to maintain some levels of control but also for other IT related companies, as for example, those dedicated to social networks... Even some political parties, include terms like "hackathon", to attract the youngest, using the subversiveness with which the term had in the past, but that nowadays has nothing compared to the original fact... So, at the end and after answering some interesting questions about the software I had just presented with this particular ideas, at one point I told to one of the assitance that: "the ethics are like the asses, each one has his own". Perhaps, the most intelligent reader, believes that I was wrong and that in reality I was referring to morality. And no, although it is not the same, ethics, in theory, refers to individual politics and morality to the collective... Anarchism says: "Each individual has jurisdiction over their own body". So, from my point of view, ethics are based on emotions and these are directly related with the desire for a type of happiness and the human condition, itself. While the second, morality, which also changes with the years and in other levels of the main conception of what we understand as an individual, refers to accepted collective behavior. For example, during a long period of history, morality supported the burning of people accused of heresy, as public acts, something unthinkable today. Recall also, that according to Roman Law, the judicial system on which the judicial system of today is based, laws must conform to ethics. And my argument is that ethics are defined by ideas and that they all seek some kind of path, towards a certain concept of happiness. So for me, the feeling of happiness, is precisely what makes us all human beings, truly unique individuals. Of course, there are those who try to homogenize happiness, through lying or generating unnecessary needs, something that loves Consumerism because is one of the main engines of the capitalist economic utopia. One more of the layers that, together with the caste system or the aristocracy system, the laboring system and the justice system, that includes the political system and the fact of to vote, suppodesly in order to choose for those that can create laws..., make up, working togheter as a machinery, what we understand as the Establishment. Also we can include to the mass-media and the FUD/shock based doctrine that some are continously applying to the citizens, as another relevant internal part of this big monster, etc. I think it's important to try to understand that Capitalism is only one part of the whole system, but it is neither the only nor the fundamental one, almost in theoretical terms. This can also be translated as a message of proximity, in the open debate between Anarcho-capitalism and Anarcho-collectivism theories, since although both share the prefix Anarcho and come from anarchist schools, their main ideals are practically opposed... Therefore, a common good advice to practice ethics, including those related to the Hacker ethics, is: "...knowing how to share and learn, from the ideas of happiness that you have yourself but also from those that others have and trying to include them in your life, always questioning the cost of obtaining and maintaining that happiness, and having present the fact that supposes to keep an idea during time that includes a perpetual seek for an emotional state of the mind, it is a really confusing meaning of life and probably, a wrong path for a correct self-realization of any individual, if it takes long time"...



What happens with work? (I)

[org: 05/05/2019] [rev: 20/05/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."In the way of working"...

Work is part of life, an important experience for individuals and a possible efficient path for a hypothetical collective evolutionary survival plan, but it does not free/develop a human-sapiens, fully. At least, the work as it is understood today and the way it has evolved, as if it has evolved so far. It simply maintains and provides uncomfortable states for the body, the mind and our common sense. Because work involves all of us. Work provides some bad habits conditioning the entire existence. Then life becomes rougher. Sometimes, if there is a criterion in the investment of resources, your life may improve in some ways, even in a personal development way, however, you will still have given your time for the enrichment project of others, which may not be useful for your will, if it has no sense for yourself or if it is not related with another larger collective plan, that almost includes you, at some point, on a more massive practical survival strategy. Or even, if these projects go against yourself, for example because they are destroying the environment which is a fundamental evolutionary part of every life form. We live in the age of connected emotions. Including empathy. Time should matter to us more than money. It is time shared with our children that matters and every good emotion related to that investment, not the money we have spent on them for their development. So: "Worker, citizen... it is time to fight for your time". Because money saves time and if you aren't rich, time is the unique real value you have. Because this is not a question about the rich against the poor. This is a question about how some people are spending our collective survival time. Something that can be translated as an objective and meaning of life. With the responsibility taken for those who deliver that meaning. Work is something very serious.. And this may be interesting, it would be an ideal situation, belonging to the group is a fundamental feature of the human being. However, the cohesion of that group is based on something as weak as current employment system and all the bureaucracy that hides the conditions, rights and obligations of every worker. You lose an energy, an impulse, that starts from the inside and that the hackers know well what I mean, that makes us advance in a somewhat special way and in many occasions, with an intellectual development in accordance with the data and projects in which we are usually involved. Companies strive to reach these situations, promoting tasks and group situations and seeking optimal harmony between people, through their Human Resources Departments. And it is usually when governments participate with their dark projects, that everything becomes a nightmare for the humble worker. It is precisely in certain emotional deceptions, where the idea of the joint project is diluted, perhaps even with an interesting purpose for Humanity, the rest of species, the planet, etc... Sometimes, with saying that it is about the human condition, it seems that the problems are diluted, but it is not so. They make them bigger. Something that does not abound. But even if this happened, even so, the individual will not find the fully growth/realization which satisfies the inner fire that every human being carries, even from birth: to explore, play, learn and know. The real human condition... In the chain of the current working system, several of these emotional and philosophical links are lost. And they are fundamental for the happiness of the individual. So, only the perpetual agony remains with the thought that there is no other way to escape than working. This thought, is a clamp for the mind, that comes to collapse or even to disconnect the matter of their being, being therefore alienated. And the result is that common people end up acting like passive workers subjected to perpetual suffering, being victims and executioners, since they collaborate directly and indirectly, to maintain a model of collective development that only puts into practice another slavery system but, on a future way. One who has multiple heads and exploits old selfish background theories and that only provides a survival plan for a few. Or not even that, since they are happy to have a few coins to hug when the ship sinks. There are people who is feeding the darkest places of the human being and being part of the problem and not of the solution. It is a pity what happens with humanity at the beginning of this century. Many people is doing useless work or that can be simply replaced. Others, in addition, putting at risk their lifes and that of their loved ones. It's terrible!. We walk towards extinction on earth, while we seek to conquer other worlds, it may to provide to a few the possibility of escape. It is a selfish plan. Although evolutionarily looks that fits. As it happens with what was explained above, it will carry an immense burden of responsibility, where new, forgetfulness will be the solution and restless minds, who discover it. But we still go so badly. We have reduced as Humanity, some parameters of poverty and mortality, drastically. But still, we know that we are capable of doing better and we still do not do it. A lot of things can change from one day to the next. That is the direction in which we must work. These are the processes that should be speed-up. Whether as a hobby, professionally, etc. If you can earn your daily bread and point to the right side, you'll see how it changes up to taste. A delight!. But until then, work less and more slower for a few and try to contribute working for the many. The change does not have to be drastic, unless you're a mountain climber or you like extreme emotions... The boycott may be not deliver your project on time, arrive late to places, delay money... Be creative and of course, do not accept unacceptable contracts. Always keep the dignity. Even, use it as a tool. Claim your individuality, through the collective and protect both of them. Sometimes, before to go to a massively public demonstration at streets, it is necessary almost to make 2 or 3 individual private demonstrations, at home. Connect the places of work, of struggle, of ideas... There is work to spare. It is a matter of changing the prism in which the main goal: "perpetual profit" is focused. Do you see it?. And if the bread does not arrive, we will see where it is stuck and unclog it, quickly!. The work is not the end. But neither the means. May work be that which we abolish. What the machines knew how to do. That human beings knew how to govern. The greatest achievement of Humanity, past the ancient age. A new era really begins, when the next day you do not have to work and you can have, assured, a personal and collective growth space, well managed and safe. But there is no magical life. These words do not work. And it may even be an utopia to even think about it. But, I believe that the basic idea on the question of work, would be to answer the question: Do we work in the right direction, towards the just and correct end?. Do I do something, on an individual level, in the same direction?. While it is true is that the work may not reveal the meaning of life, nor save us at the last minute through the clemency of some God. It may serve as a focusable tool, collectively and individually, towards wiser objectives, being in operation as it is. Maybe we do not have to unmake everything, but redirect/reproject/reinvent it and, therefore, this will save us preciously, work. I mean, to exploit it on a most efficient way for a more inclusive collective survival plan. In any case, in a pragmatic way and although it sounds paradoxical, in the epoch in which we live, it's time to work. But being the priority you and the people you love. And if you are not for yourself, or you can fall easily on egoistic or narcissistic conditions, or even you do not have people to love, which is a really sad situation and I am so sorry because of that, at least do it for this precious planet that has allowed us to know each other. And if you're crazy do it even for me, but please; "Do not try to give me more work than I already have because preciously a good example for a path when talking about the work is working but also saving work to others. Cheer up!"...



A contact window

[org: 30/04/2019] [rev: 09/05/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

...About myself...

When some things start, others just finish. Change is the only constant. Almost, in this galaxy. And a tradition, can be a stick in the wheel of change. I feel myself anti-capitalist, anti-consumerist, anti-clasista, ecologist and even anarchist. And quite contrary to everything Anti-. I am aware of the language barriers and for that I need labels to put, hundreds, to give a more accurate perspective, not only about me but also about you and about all. We live in the society of labels that seek to have everything under control, because we are afraid of not knowing things. I know what the game is about. I've been watching it long time. I am a hacker. {Wake up!}. So it may not even be anything like that. Life is a mirror of confusion. And we must deal with some apparently perpetual contradictions. But just do not look at yourself. Or into others. Or even on me, which is the person I better know. The thing is try to not look too much. You have to know, like when you work with the silence, when to look and how. Same to speak. Time is the unique value on this game. No narcissism. Or a bit, but under constact work. As machismo. As sadness itself. Like every human condition. Life is a race of resistance. And although the end is tragic, it is worth participating. Go out and dance when you feel that is a need because life is also to enjoy. Sometimes I lie to protect myself from threats that do not exist. Paranoia can be silenced with a mixture of madness. Sometimes with drugs. But always with courage at the root. No Solipsism. From that, by the moment, I am pretty sure. Ideas and beliefs also change. You aren't alone, almost for me. I always try my best against the frontiers. The truth always ahead. Like the life. Like the love. {Stop!}. Now to speak and to contribute, it is a duty. Let's save almost something. Let's walk towards extinction with our heads held high, at least, saving the planet so that other forms of life can continue. Self-destruction but from a compassion perspective. And I am in several of its phases and other more experimental. I let myself be influenced, as I have also been an influence. And no, I do not say that I agree with anarchism, but I am an anarchist. And I feel proud, not only of being one, but of being able to say it openly to the world, with all the repressive consequences that this may have... From nowadays feminism (also called from "third wave") I have learned, although it seems a contradiction, that language is not so important. But the consciousness that has been generated from it, even if it has been incorrect. Behind every thought there is an emotion and so on. That the barrier is not overcome, putting others. That custom, is the enemy of evolution... Before, if he was an anarchist of purity, he was in communion, for that reason: "an anarchist never says he is, but rather a communion". "Look at me world, I am not in communion with anarchism. But I am an anarchist". The rules are to be put to the test, including those that govern the ideology. How good it is to read every day a little of everything and everything about something concrete. If you do it as something everyday, like someone who pisses in the garden to feel the flat nature, in an outburst to transgress, even, about something as natural and beneficial as it is. Like masturbation or menstruation. But including on that practices also to save water for the rest, for example... Equality. Responsible vital balance. I wish a man could shave his beard to another without feeling any blush. The brotherhood of the warrior. Let the routine be the maintenance of the body, the mind, the common sense and the house. "Children of Hades. It's time to depart Concordia in pieces". How to smile, regardless of the pain with which it is charged, for the benefit of Humanity... Before, I did not think it was relevant to say where it comes from. That it was a burden, of those that labeled you to a site, and that gave too much information to strangers. Now I have it clear. It is important to say it. The context. I'm here, because of my past. I am the sum of everything I went. I am my current self and my past self. But also I am my future self. I am all of them and at same time. I am my friends. And I am my family. And I never make a distinction between them. I do not use social networks too much, nor do I have a smartphone. Even, nor do I have a checking account in any bank. I have nothing with me and everything is close, but buried, hidden or well guarded. I have some solar panels to provide some energy to my non-legal place to life, which I call when the sun is on my smile: "sweet homelab". I am from the Basque Country as a placement reference. Specifically from Bilbao. Although I also owe my being to all the places I have gone through, I limit myself to giving a specific and important piece of information. I am international-list. But I understand that sometimes is needed to use nationalism as a temporal tactic for some kind of warfare. I still believe in Humanity... I was born, along with what is now the cradle of the "bread and circus" of my town, although converted to geriatric and whose name does justice, perhaps not very poetic, "Sacred Heart". I was born in the harsh period, with an open war, lasting, terrible and very very present in the streets, in the trains, in the looks. Between an oppressed people and a decadent and rancid empire. Among a group of scoundrels, prisoners of drugs and many times, no reason, and a people who did not understand certain extremes, certain peculiarities, histories and other emotional elements of the equation. And I was born into a traditional working class family. Where the male goes to look for resources and the female keeps the home and the pot, hot, sickly ordered and with a customary vision in the decoration. Even if they don't know how to love each other. Nothing out of the ordinary, being poor as I still am. I prefer to say that I am rich in other values. Although this cost me to be poor in real life. I do not believe that the middle class exists. As I do not think it is something to say that you are poor, mostly because the privileged society marker is defined by an imaginary, fiduciary and slave value as the currency and its international market. Once I believed that I was middle class, but luckily, I took the reins of my life, starting in squatting groups, with about 20 years old and while I was studying, the mind immediately eliminated it. How beautiful the experience, how it overcomes theory and practice together. It is so, far-sighted, as the enemy's comfort of reason. Let's go, free yourself, normalize it. Hack your mind!. There are no drugs, they are just addictions. Decontrol of the mind-body balance. Balance your being. Make it the routine. There is the right to self-destruction. Honor, if it is not free, is paid high in the spheres of honesty. That, whether or not they govern the existence of a plan, are good forms and Humanity, even though it sounds worn out, still needs values to rework. In the crisis of values, reuse more than recycle, combine rather than single out, add more than subtract and dispose more than snatch. Every offense involves a defense. And if there is violence, mud and our perversion, double will be the chimera and their heads, and the tombs to dig, but it will be done, as has always been done, until a glimpse of perception is observed. It is there, then, that the sovereignty that gives power, putrefied, surely has those heights, becomes a slab that anarchists will know how to discard, for the training that supposes to fight the hierarchies since they are born. And so it will be, distributed, encrypted in a preventive and federated way in your organization. Sustainable, or with assumed extinction. The advancement of the new era. And the devacle of our civilization. At least, as it is erected. I do not want the world to burn, because I love life and all the beings that populate the earth, including fossils or the unfortunate. But I am willing to destroy it in his name. What a vital paradox. I like to be a human... Thank you schools of anarchy for this: "No fear, no limits, no control". For that I fight against control. For that I try to bypass every limit I have. Because I don't want to feel fear, nevermove. One million of masks for all of you. Now I know that I am not alone...