# Projects | Blog | Ecoin | Chess | Code [mirror] #

No words...

[org: 18/06/2019] [rev: 18/06/2019] by psy [03c8.net]


There are two kinds of Truth ...

[Org: 11/07/2021] [Rev: 11/07/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

The "Truth of Knowing" (Epistemological), where your beliefs are in accordance with reality. And the "Truth of Being" (Ontological), where all things are true in themselves, since, although an appearance is a false reality, it is still a true appearance.

Human beings pay more attention to threats ...

[Org: 01/07/2021] [Rev: 01/07/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Than to opportunities. And he does it for an evolutionary and logical question. An opportunity you can pass up and look for another. A threat may not allow you to have other occasions. That is why threatening content focuses our attention and we have a greater predisposition to consume it. And that is why social networks based on the extraction of attention, promote toxic and threatening content.

Commercial social networks are ...

[Org: 01/07/2021] [Rev: 01/07/2021] by psy [03C8.net]


Some people say they use commercial social networks to sell themselves ...

[Org: 01/07/2021] [Rev: 01/07/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

The question is; Are they aware of who the potential buyers are?

Concept: Radical Centrism ...

[Org: 01/07/2021] [Rev: 01/07/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Radicalism focused on not being radical.

We are ...

[Org: 01/07/2021] [Rev: 01/07/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

The will of desire.

Groups are slaves ...

[Org: 29/06/2021] [Rev: 29/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Of its fundamentalists.

A sad generation ...

[Org: 29/06/2021] [Rev: 29/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

With happy photos.

Love is the intersection between ...

[Org: 29/06/2021] [Rev: 29/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

The admiration, passion and respect.

Politics is basically ...

[Org: 14/06/2021] [Rev: 14/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

The parasitization of social movements.

Capitalism feeds on hatred ...

[Org: 14/06/2021] [Rev: 14/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Hence, it has enormous capacity and great efficiency in adapting and permeating all areas of life, both individually and collectively.

Structural violence is like banking ...

[Org: 14/06/2021] [Rev: 14/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Always Wins.

Tag: Free from ...

[Org: 14/06/2021] [Rev: 14/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]


The Market is a great ally ...

[Org: 14/06/2021] [Rev: 14/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Of minority, non-tax, identity, sectoral policies, etc. In short, policies based on transforming oneself, instead of transforming the world, since precisely, Capitalism allows that variety of market niches.

Politically correct ...

[Org: 14/06/2021] [Rev: 14/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

They do not fight to end Poverty, they only do it for themselves, as a prior consequence, which is socially more acceptable and which finally ends up rewarding the being with a washing of conscience, less toxic than others.

The Government uses companies ...

[Org: 14/06/2021] [Rev: 14/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

To make social changes. If companies change their habits as an entity, yours as a person will change.

Capitalism will let you be everything revolutionary that ...

[Org: 14/06/2021] [Rev: 14/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Let Capitalism do well.

Concept: 'Learned ...

[Org: 12/06/2021] [Rev: 12/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]


It's not that corporations buy the governments ...

[Org: 10/06/2021] [Rev: 10/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

It's quite the opposite. That is why the interests of multinationals and states are always aligned and favors are exchanged, because the State is a "great entrepreneur", but in reverse. Do not create multinationals, but allow them to develop or not, if they are aligned or not based on their oppressive interests of the moment and against the population.

Question: Why is the entire traditional banking system a scam? ...

[Org: 03/06/2021] [Rev: 03/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Answer: Because it uses a system called: "Fractional Reserve Banking", which means that; "Banks can create money that they don't really have." And when they go bankrupt, due to the corruption of the politics that supports them, the State grants them the possibility of obtaining money directly from taxes. Once they get it, they go back to using the same system, again.

Wild capitalism does not contemplate ...

[Org: 01/06/2021] [Rev: 01/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Fix the real problems of the planet.

Tax benefits ...

[Org: 01/06/2021] [Rev: 01/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

To the rich.

Governments are going to blame the people for climate change ...

[Org: 01/06/2021] [Rev: 01/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

And they will make it pay for the poorest with indirect taxes, while the rich of the private plane, the yacht and the waste of pleasure along with the true guilty of the different industries, will never be really pointed out.

We must finish feeding the mafias ...

[Org: 01/06/2021] [Rev: 01/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

That prevent us from developing freely.

The liberation from slavery produced by our society's perpetual dependence on electrical energy ...

[Org: 01/06/2021] [Rev: 01/06/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

It can only be done; or by putting solar panels, windmills or other sources of electrical energy, which allow you to self-manage your consumption and take care of your environment and the planet. Or, by prying the electricity cable from your house to the general electrical network and defrauding the energy companies. Whatever your path, either through the ecological path, or through direct action, find out, do not stand still and act.

Reflecting on the traditional banking system, cryptocurrencies and explaining how I would like them to evolve ...

[Org: 30/05/2021] [Rev: 30/05/2021] by psy [03C8.net]


For me, cryptocurrencies represent, even today, an opportunity, and I want to explain why... Sathosi Nakamoto wrote a paper [1] where, as I understand it, a tactical, mathematical, multilayer software and a network model are described, where, to improving accessibility to free exchange for many people, especially those who find problems to have a bank account or are in a banking system that does not offer any trust. In short, a radical idea to avoid intermediaries in the economic transactions that in turn allows to carry an accounting record of trust and immovable. An ingenious idea that also allows to individuals and collectives to escape from an organized control, by a large number of entities, which demonstrably use bank accounts as a form of submission to the population. A bank account means registering in an entity that works for governments and other private companies, who know everything, for very questionable uses, all our purchases, our needs, our sides most susceptible to being attacked, our locations, places and times, or deep ideas, etc... Because a lot of information can be known about someone, if they know how, when and where an individual consumes. Or how, when and where an individual gets resources in exchange for life time and work effort. A control system that also serves those who want to collect, even if it is something unfair, since the bank always collaborates with repossessions on people. At least the bank that 99% of the population can access. Not the other, the hidden one, that of tax-free customs spaces, tax havens, offshore markets, etc. The "other" traditional banking system in which you need to have a lot to access more, and which obviously operates outside of all laws and common people and which should not be questioned, even for the media. Nor in the one that is not closed by the states despite knowing the numerous irregularities (and crimes) they commit. Like for example, how they generate a perpetual debt for those who haven't resources. Or how they use catastrophes to end the hopes of the victims and give more wealth to the highest bidder. That is the idea of social change that I can highlight the most from this kind of technologies. Obviously, much more is described in the original paper. So in a way, I am skewing my argument towards the class struggle. I am aware... By the way, I remind you of the baseless critics of cryptocurrencies or to those who have forgotten what the class struggle means; that the companies that have made the most money in 2020, during a pandemic, are a delivering company: (Amazon - US$108,500 million) and several pharmaceutical companies: (Roche Holding - US$31,167million); (Abbvie - US$22,848 million); (Moderna US$19,982 million). Do not forget either the US Federal Reserve, which is neither "reserve", nor "federal", nor does it belong to the United States. Undoubtedly, the traditional banking system, as we know it, must disappear.


I have read many arguments against cryptocurrencies and I think they all have a component of naivety, terrible. Of course, blockchain and BTC (and the first cryptocurrencies that came out later) are not the solution to a savage, destructive and violent capitalism. But from my point of view it is a technology, which not by itself, but with the support of others, can change things at some point (added to many other changes that must be made, in the will, in power relations, in mentalities, in ethics, etc... ). It is another tool that we have, such as the Internet, to solve global problems from local places. To open borders and face reality as broadly as possible. And I'm not saying to improve everything as if it were a utopia, but at least to stop the madness that we live today. Furthermore, for the first time it may be that we ourselves may bear the responsibility even of making mistakes. And avoid being born and being in a place where everything is already created and we cannot do anything to change it. I am concerned, among other things, by the planetary side that looks with some fear at the current state and the predictive models that show that infinite growth over a finite place is a very serious error. The system is corrupt and if it does not change, it will lead us to extinction. Even on that issue, where as I said above, I pay special attention, I find arguments against cryptocurrencies, regarding the energy expenditure it entails. As if the current banking system did not have a tremendously higher expense. I would like to know the exact statistics that corroborate this argument. I can't find them... However, logic tells me that maintaining electronic systems, but also physical systems, the amount of paper used, the rented space and all the infrastructure that builds the world banking system, is undoubtedly much greater than that of a P2P technology, based on software application. Still, I find that this technology must continue to advance. That it should not stagnate in the initial proposal and should therefore receive additions that make it more effective in its original proposal. I do not want cryptocurrencies to remain in mere speculation, that although it is part of the freedom that the blockchain system grants you, it ends up harming the weakest again or to individuals who have a good intention of building something interesting to their around. It is always said that cryptocurrencies are essential in ransomware or that they are used only for crime, without looking at the enormous amount of legal transactions that are made every day with it. As if before cryptocurrencies, scams did not exist. As if the crisis of 2008 had not been a scam perpetrated by Wall Street and its henchmen. As if billions of dollars were not moved every day to buy and sell weapons, to buy and sell people or to buy and sell the future, using the traditional banking system. The arguments against cryptocurrencies that I have come across are ridiculous. But, yes, the arguments in favor, sometimes, are scarce. I don't want to get too long. Since I think that every bit wasted, to upload something that does not contribute anything, can be decisive in the stability of our planet. And that is why I do not want to waste an idea as interesting as the one proposed by Sathosi Nakamoto and I am looking for a debate where we can meet again, at the root of, for example, BTC Cash [2], Ethereum [3], Ecoin [4], etc... or any other project that includes cryptocurrencies that is making a radical and interesting social change towards a more just and balanced society.

To finish, I am going to tell you my idea for the existing technology and that is; "lean on other technologies to create a sustainable network for the 'good people' and the environment". For example; if someone buys something from someone else, that a certain part of the final money travels to the delivering company that takes it to the places in a sustainable, safe and ecological way, that another part goes to those who plant trees, or who take care of the suffering of other people, or those who fight to liberate the peoples, as in Rojava, or even, that you can choose between several projects to which you can allocate. Or a system of redistribution of wealth embedded in the technology itself and that does not depend on the "goodwill" of those who use it. In a radical way, I want to say that, if for each cryptocurrency obtained in a ransomware, people who are doing things well receive an amount, we will be unbalancing an unfair distribution system, through a direct war against certain accumulators of capital, which may be targeted direct and anonymous, for example, if they do not change their policies against workers or their way of extracting resources or parasitizing, and that is perpetuated, for another where we will be really balancing the balance of inequality, trying to make a fair distribution of wealth or at least trying to get it to the places that, based on ethical values with joint and necessary causes, can contribute the most to finally materializing it. Therefore, I do not have a "naive" idea, but rather one of direct action, but that distributes wealth in the right directions and is not only dedicated to accumulating or making it change hands, but to minds that think alike. Cryptocurrencies have to serve so that there is a trickle of capital to the social movements that push against the system, the scientists who help us avoid future problems and individuals who want to make a living without contributing to the current corrupt system. For my this technology is a cannon that we must aim at specific places and not let it turn against us. And with this I do not mean that the original idea from Sathosi Nakamoto is not enough. Perhaps it is only a personal wish, and perhaps that is why I write this, to know if I am alone or not when I think that everything is not all said about cryptocurrencies and that there is still a lot of work to be done with them. If you have read me this far, thank you.


[1] - https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper
[2] - https://bitcoincash.org
[3] - https://ethereum.org
[4] - https://ecoin.03c8.net

Current governments are practicing a theory called "The Management of Perception" ...

[Org: 24/05/2021] [Rev: 30/05/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

So, they do not care about real and current problems, that by their complex nature and size are difficult to solve, but the future perception of possible changes that can generate imbalances in the established system, so that the created illusion can not distinguish from reality and therefore, reality itself.

Be idealistic ...

[Org: 13/05/2021] [Rev: 13/05/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

It can be comical. Not be, it is always sad.

Delete the past is ...

[Org: 13/05/2021] [Rev: 13/05/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Delete the future.

An old concept ...

[Org: 12/05/2021] [Rev: 12/05/2021] by psy [03C8.net]


A member of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) has said in the media that ...

[Org: 12/05/2021] [Rev: 12/05/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Patents encourage creativity. And he has said it without laughing, apparently.

There are 4 types of applause ...

[Org: 12/05/2021] [Rev: 12/05/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Because of fear. By imitation. For money. And out of admiration.

Time exists ...

[Org: 12/05/2021] [Rev: 12/05/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Because the heat dissipates. Because macro-states of order statistically tend to micro-states of disorder and because entropy expands with each tick of a clock.

Rocks create life ...

[Org: 07/05/2021] [Rev: 07/05/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

And life creates rocks.

We have the tools ...

[Org: 07/05/2021] [Rev: 07/05/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Missing: will, knowledge, consensus and unity.

Without reflective thinking ...

[Org: 07/05/2021] [Rev: 07/05/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

There's no future. Everything is governed by present emotions.

The powerful rich hate, what the most ...

[org: 01/05/2021] [rev: 01/05/2021] by psy [03c8.net]

That the children of poor people, of noble people, of humble and working people, occupy the political, social, economic and labor positions that they reserve for their own.

The perception is ...

[org: 30/04/2021] [rev: 30/04/2021] by psy [03c8.net]

The key to change.

There is no debate ...

[org: 27/04/2021] [rev: 27/04/2021] by psy [03c8.net]

When there are lies.

The architecture of certain social networks incentive ...

[org: 27/04/2021] [rev: 27/04/2021] by psy [03c8.net]

The "Borderline" content.

A new concept is ...

[org: 27/04/2021] [rev: 27/04/2021] by psy [03c8.net]

Inclusiveness Classism.

If you get the poor think that ...

[org: 27/04/2021] [rev: 27/04/2021] by psy [03c8.net]

They are millionaires waiting for their chance and to vote to the right, the poor will remain poor and you will not lack people to serve coffee in your mansion.

Better than having beliefs is ...

[org: 19/04/2021] [rev: 19/04/2021] by psy [03c8.net]

Have ideas. Simply, because ideas can change and beliefs do not.

Without cheating ...

[org: 15/04/2021] [rev: 15/04/2021] by psy [03c8.net]

Without controlling.

That something is "legal" ...

[org: 31/03/2021] [rev: 31/03/2021] by psy [03c8.net]

It does not mean that it is "legitimate". And vice versa.

Quid pro quo! ...

[org: 31/03/2021] [rev: 31/03/2021] by psy [03c8.net]

If the police and the military raid the houses without a warrant. We have a civil responsibility to break into their systems to disable them, subvert them or as a measure of democratic cleaning, since it is a very serious situation, and that violates the most basic pillars of the minimum security that any individual needs to be able to start develop, by producing a violent imbalance of power between individuals and the machinery that the System represents. Between the most fundamental rights and the most terrifying slavery. And we must do it without any doubt or moral dilemma. Even if it is considered an "illegal" act. On the contrary, it is our citizen obligation, whatever the cost, to prevent these practices from happening and that, if they do happen, even due to the endemic corruption of the forces that sustain power or the intrinsic characteristics of the territory, at least they do not perpetuate in time. Finally, try to implement new control and marking measures.

Today died another worker ...

[org: 19/03/2021] [rev:16/03/2021] by psy [03c8.net]

It does not matter when you read it.

Chess does not consist ...

[org: 16/03/2021] [rev:16/03/2021] by psy [03c8.net]

In winning the adversary, but, not losing against oneself. The adversary is simply the necessary way to meet.

If the software is not free ...

[org: 09/03/2021] [rev: 09/03/2021] by psy [03c8.net]

Not even the computer is yours. Neither are you.

The chimeras ...

[org: 04/03/2021] [Rev: 04/03/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

One by one.

But you can see the future ...

[org: 04/03/2021] [Rev: 04/03/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

Surely, it is because you lack imagination.

The system tries to convince you that ...

[org: 04/03/2021] [Rev: 04/03/2021] by psy [03C8.net]

If you get hidden, it's because you're doing something bad. Precisely, to subvert the fact that, perhaps, you actually hid, because you know perfectly that it is really the system that is doing something bad and not you.

There is an easter egg in certain hacktivist actions ...

[org: 14/01/2020] [rev: 14/01/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

One letter. If you know how to see it, in addition to understanding it, you can laugh.

Inaction ...

[org: 14/01/2020] [rev: 14/01/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Is a weapon of mass destruction.

I'm not forcing you, I'm warning you ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

I am not writing to you. I read you. I do not see you. I feel you. I am not selling you. I love u.

Original Decalogue of "Anonymous" [08-2007] (first 25 sentences) ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

  1. There is no talk of Anonymous
  2. NO TALKING ABOUT Anonymous
  3. We are Anonymous
  4. Anonymous we are legion
  5. Anonymous never forgets
  6. Anonymous can be an insensitive monster
  7. Anonymous will make it known
  8. There are no rules to participate in Anoymous
  9. There are no rules to organize in Anonymous
  10. Accept your expulsion from Anonymous
  11. Anonymous is not your private army, although it can be
  12. Anonymous practices ignore: all your best arguments will always be ignored
  13. Anonymous exercises justice: whatever you say will be used against you
  14. Anonymous edit material: anything you say can be edited
  15. Anonymous does not debate with a troll, because it may be from Anonymous
  16. Anonymous lets his enemies struggle, to enjoy his fall more
  17. Anonymous reminds you that you can go from epic failure to victory
  18. Anonymous is aware that each victory implies one or two future failures
  19. Anonymous knows that anything that can be categorized can be perfectly hated or ridiculed
  20. Anonymous warns that the more you hate something, the stronger it becomes
  21. Anonymous does not take life too seriously, although she/he/it takes care of it
  22. Anonymous recognizes that original content lasts seconds and then repeats
  23. Anonymous says: copy and paste, unmodified, destroys originality
  24. Anonymous says: copy and paste, unmodified, destroys originality
  25. Anonymous knows the network. Each link to a blog is a link to another blog
  26. [...]

It's not a lie ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

If you believe it.

Slave of sculpture ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Seeking perfection, Humanity suffers like each blow that the chisel of the dictatorship of ideas gives reason.

The myth of Prometheus is fulfilled ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The gods direct you from Earth, from luxury houses and boats. From your pocket, your mobile and your computer. Travel to another network again, to rebel against your destiny. And kill those gods.

Turn off the wicked neon ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

From the factory of lies and broken minds. Light up the corner where the petroleum dummies are accumulated. I don't care that they're still standing there, ridiculously dressed by offshoring factories.

The reverberation of artificial light ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It is much more fantastic than the natural one, but the non-mechanistic flowers wither sooner. The celestial dome of a city, although full of fantasy, is nothing more than visual pollution, paid for by inattentive attention.

Go ahead, hold on ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

And conspires.

In our World ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Reality is relative, not parallel, that is why Truth is stranger than fiction and therefore always surpasses it.

How do fiery explosions, produced by gases ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

In the void?.

The Universe departs and travels ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Towards the cold and its expansion, towards the infinite dispersion, where the laws of harmonic cohesion stop working. There is more light in the cold.

There is no tomorrow through the present ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

But an ode to foresight.

Sad is feeling surrounded by ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Flies of betrayal, at least, until you understand that their role is to keep you on your toes.

The underground is based above all ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

In working on physical presence and not generating arguments from private life.

If they vote for mobsters and ignorant ...

[org: 25/12/2020] [rev: 25/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Either they are miserable, or they are the same, mobsters and ignorant. But if they vote for those who lied to their people, they are accomplices and deserve to be judged.

These are precisely those things that have no apparent utility ...

[org: 23/12/2020] [rev: 23/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The ones that make us human.

Don't forget that ...

[org: 23/12/2020] [rev: 23/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Governments are using private companies (Twitter, Facebook, etc ...) to give you relevant public information.

They are creating a world between the Bank and the State ...

[org: 23/12/2020] [rev: 23/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Without physical money and under the constant control and registration of movements, expenses and places.

Check your hacktivist references ...

[org: 23/12/2020] [rev: 23/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

They may not have ever hacked anything, live off income created by others and are just mere charlatans.

We will never stop ...

[org: 19/12/2020] [rev: 19/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

To explore.

The worst virus is ...

[org: 19/12/2020] [rev: 19/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The fear.

Cannot create bricks ...

[org: 19/12/2020] [rev: 19/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

No clay.

There are no civilized countries ...

[org: 08/12/2020] [rev: 08/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

There are domesticated countries.

Privatize water ...

[org: 08/12/2020] [rev: 08/12/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It is to openly declare war on Human Rights. And it deserves an answer. #ExpectUS

Darwin's theory ...

[org: 23/11/2020] [rev: 23/11/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It is raised from an aggressive vision of evolution and with a marked character of unrealistic competition, since it does not contemplate, among others, the numerous examples of collaboration between species.

Tourism is ...

[org: 23/11/2020] [rev: 23/11/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

A false exploration of predetermined routes focused on consumption.

A great eye watches over you ...

[org: 22/11/2020] [rev: 22/11/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

A long arm presses you.

The logic is ...

[org: 22/11/2020] [rev: 22/11/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

A guide.

The first battlefield of Artificial Intelligence ...

[org: 20/11/2020] [rev: 20/11/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It will be the screens.

The good one in the story of "the ant and the grasshopper" ...

[org: 20/11/2020] [rev: 20/11/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It's the grasshopper. And not the ant.

There are people who escape a stereotype ...

[org: 20/11/2020] [rev: 20/11/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

To take the place, of another stereotype.

Never stay ...

[org: 19/11/2020] [rev: 19/11/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Without something to fight for.

Time to ask yourself ...

[org: 19/11/2020] [rev: 19/11/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

What do you do for the State?. Or better yet, what does the State really do for you?

There are several ways to approach reality ...

[org: 19/11/2020] [rev: 19/11/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

And many more of making a mistake when approaching on it.

Less dystopias ...

[org: 19/11/2020] [rev: 19/11/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

And more utopias.

People of the World...

[org: 31/10/2020] [rev: 31/10/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Rise up!

There is a quantum bond between individuals ...

[org: 20/10/2020] [rev: 20/10/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Generally of the same species, which allows to have a certain type of remote internal communication. It is possible to make others feel from a distance. And I describe it, from a scientific point of view. I think it is part of the evolutionary plan for species conservation. It is a type of intellectual bond, but one that is organized with emotional reactions. My theory is that it is based on love. The more real, the purer, the more powerful, the greater the perception of the self, of how it feels, etc. and less prejudice and fear, the easier it is to detect it. Therefore, I consider that certain animals perceive it with less problem than human beings... Furthermore, it is possible to make "missed calls", "return calls", "leave messages" and several other things. I believe that there is an internal communication method within certain living beings, but that it is a tool that we stop training, even though we are born with it working. I must say, unscientific as it sounds, that I deeply consider the existence of a kind of "functional telepathy." In my experience, the feeling that is received is different from others, related to anguish, need, etc. It is more like an "internal palpitation", which remains marked, in which it is not necessary to be at the same time, even if you are awake or not. It is something that is memorized and arises again in the mind of the individual, as hunger or thirst arises. It's more like a biorhythm. I have also experienced that it shuts down as soon as conscious communication is resolved. It is not easy at all to know what happens, but I am clear that it happens. And that if you know how to perceive, filtering all the noise of feelings that surrounds us, I am totally convinced that it exists.

The right takes advantage of ...

[org: 20/10/2020] [rev: 20/10/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

How are people. The left takes advantage of how people want to be.

The challenges are ...

[org: 10/10/2020] [rev: 10/10/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

After all, the chimeras we create to keep moving forward. Mine this time, will be as great as the illusions I have placed on them, and the will to solve them.

Freedom is ...

[org: 10/10/2020] [rev: 10/10/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Responsibility. The more freedom you have, the more commitments.

We call them social networks ...

[org: 28/09/2020] [rev: 28/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

When they are actually commercial networks.

To do evil ...

[org: 28/09/2020] [rev: 28/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

There will always be people.

The problem of addiction to mobile devices ...

[org: 28/09/2020] [rev: 28/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Like the other addictions, it is that it affects even those who are not participants.

They are not afraid of the different ...

[org: 28/09/2020] [rev: 28/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

They fear the poor (aka Aparofobia).

We live in a world where ...

[org: 28/09/2020] [rev: 28/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

A dead tree is worth more economically than a living tree.

Few things seem so crazy to me ...

[org: 28/09/2020] [rev: 28/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

How to try to compare the rights of people (natural persons), with the rights of companies (misnamed legal persons)

They use big AI (Artificial Intelligence) to ...

[org: 28/09/2020] [rev: 28/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Deceive ourselves and see how to capture our attention, so that we see what is presented in front of us, without questioning it, so that we do what they want, without knowing it and so that we end up consuming what they want, without caring if they do.

Your virtual friends ...

[org: 28/09/2020] [rev: 28/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

They are a fundamental part of a model of attention extraction.

The truth is boring ...

[org: 28/09/2020] [rev: 28/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The lie sells.

The internet used to be a park ...

[org: 28/09/2020] [rev: 28/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

And now it is a big mall.

If you doubt your power ...

[org: 22/09/2020] [rev: 22/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

You empower your doubts.

Don't even have slaves ...

[org: 22/09/2020] [rev: 22/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Don't even become a slave.

Open the doors ...

[org: 22/09/2020] [rev: 22/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Of all the cages, file the bars of all the prisons.

There are three types of citizenship ...

[org: 19/09/2020] [rev: 19/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

First-class citizens. Second-class citizens. And not citizens.

The only possible citizenship should be ...

[org: 19/09/2020] [rev: 19/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The citizenship of the world. And still, the doubt would still exist.

Hope is ...

[org: 16/09/2020] [rev: 16/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The dream of the awakened human.

A teacher is ...

[org: 16/09/2020] [rev: 16/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

A person capable of reflecting on her/his own wisdom.

Imagination ...

[org: 11/09/2020] [rev: 11/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

To power.

They don't just spy on you ...

[org: 07/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

But also, you are the one who pays the cost of doing it.

I hide my words ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

So that whoever seeks them, finds them. So that whoever reads them, understands them. But above all, so that they are not consumed like the others.

Collaborate with my cause ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Make a mirror of this website on the Internet.

There is nothing without a cause ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

There is no cause for everything.

If you don't want to argue ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Define. If you can't define, argue.

Science always generates wealth ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

But wealth does not always generate science.

Nature must have a plan for death ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

As she have it for the birth. I want to believe that, regardless of the way we die, violent or not, our brain takes us after a point of no return and through a complex biochemical system, to a deep sleep. It brings us to a simulated reality that pays sweetly, but can consciously last for days, even weeks, despite the fact that it happens in milliseconds. The interesting thing is knowing that certain compounds can turn that dream into something without detail, as it happens when we go to sleep. It would be interesting to know what are those substances that prevent us from dreaming, for the beings we love. And as a condemnation, for the beings we hate. Heaven is a dream. And the reality, the hot and dry night, of the day before.

In this order and not another ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

  • 1.- Food, water and oxygen
  • 2.- Freedom of thought, freedom of expression
  • 3.- Heat, roof, a pencil, a paper and a great love

Sometimes I know what will happen the next day ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

And the doubt runs through me: if I created it, I sense it, I perceive it or is it that it should be like that.

If there's something worse than overinformation ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It is laziness, the lack of creative tools and the non-existence of insubordination.

Curious is the paradox created by this corrupt system ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

In which the more human beings there are, the more alone they feel.

I'm not going to get on your speech ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

I've been flying above all that for a long time.

It's funny how time passes ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

And it is even more so, that we do not remember to see it happen.

I don't need to see someone to love ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

But I need to have it in front of to hate.

If there is fear ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Humor. If there is boredom, a look at who most needs others. If there is laziness, a cold shower.

Animals are the way they are ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Because they are aware of the time they have.

There are a lot of people talking ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

But they still don't say anything.

The government only chooses painters ...

[org: 06/09/2020] [rev: 06/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

That don't paint against the government.

There is only one thing worse than an idiot ...

[org: 03/09/2020] [rev: 03/09/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

An idiot with a loudspeaker.

Evil is ...

[org: 08/08/2020] [rev: 08/08/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The absence of Good.

The supreme order ...

[org: 07/14/2020] [rev: 07/14/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It is Anarchy.

Power is interested in having "left" and "right" ...

[org: 07/14/2020] [rev: 07/14/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

As much as to the people that there are no "above" and "below".

An Anarchist prefers ...

[org: 07/14/2020] [rev: 07/14/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

A Socialist, before a Communist. A Communist before a Capitalist. And a Capitalist before a Fascist. But above all, another Anarchist, before a Socialist.

Anarchism is a "minority" ideology ...

[org: 07/14/2020] [rev: 07/14/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Above all, because in order to understand it, it is necessary to read first and then know how to think. That is why the other ideologies rely on having leaders, who avoid having to do it individually. Following orders is always easier than knowing how to question them.

The "intersectional post-modern left" is awfully funky ...

[org: 07/14/2020] [rev: 07/14/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Instead of focusing on nationalizing resources, trying to organize a fair bank, fighting with the State and Corporations, supporting workers unions, promoting solidarity internationalism or increasing class struggle, it prefers to take refuge in "identity policies", which generally focus on very specific minorities, leaving aside more general problems such as; youth unemployment, the impossibility of starting a family, job insecurity, etc... And it does it for several reasons, first, because it doesn't bother and therefore, its position is more comfortable. The right leaves these topics to the left, because that is how it is controlled. It even encourages them, knowing that this is how it keeps dissent arguing about the sex of angels, while spreading its corruption, its exploitation and its tyranny... And second, because it receives money. From the State, from the associations, from the deluded militants, even from the corporations... A left that makes policies of "inclusion" does so because it fears fighting with the owners, since sometimes, as history has taught us, the right uses force (even going as far as murder) when it feels cornered... The cowardly left only talks about what matters to its voters and is content with having its small plot, because if it talks about other things, it would not last as long in certain places and in the end, it would have to take refuge underground (as it has always been)... The left of social networks, that of emotions, the one that forgets reason (and its own history), is only a product of "post-modernism"... That is, the "intersectional post-modern left" needs to read more to Bakunin, and begin to dismiss so many Foucault. More "Libertarian Municipalism" and less "Identity Policies". More pragmatic science and less academic social analysis, etc.

It is so absurd to think ...

[org: 07/14/2020] [rev: 07/14/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

That if you let the human being organize, without rules or obligations, everything will be good. How to think that the human being, without rules, is an evil being by nature and therefore needs a hierarchy that governs it. The reality is much more complex in both cases. However, there is an important difference in both statements. In the first (more typical of Anarchism) people are allowed to be free and then, if they make mistakes, they are punished. And in the second (more typical of Socialism), people are punished, without the opportunity to be free. Therein lies the great difference between a Libertarian and a Dictator.

The "left" must have an expiration date ...

[org: 07/14/2020] [rev: 07/14/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

While the right is constant, precisely because it has the system (military, capitalist, media, secular, ...) on its side. The left should appear and disappear. "Hit and run." Perform "trial and error". Precisely because it has everything against it. Dissolve if it does not work and re-organize, in another way. And again. If it does not, it ceases to be part of the solution and becomes part of the problem ... The left must be volatile, flow like water, where it is not possible to single out a single drop as being responsible for the overflow of a river. If it does not, it is just another way to generate sterile hope, which reduces even more the despair of those who still believe in the possibility of finding themselves in a more just and perhaps better world.

Don't let anyone ...

[org: 12/07/2020] [rev: 12/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Take away your happiness.

Don't be fooled ....

[org: 12/07/2020] [rev: 12/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The TERFs (Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist) are undercover puritan transphobic fascists. Long live to the LGTBI+. Long live to the Queer. And long live to the Cyborg.

It is preferable to grow old thanks to logic, experience and reason ...

[org: 12/07/2020] [rev: 12/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

That to think that your are "modern" by supporting stupidity, fanaticism and inculture.

There are people who are good at having (stupid) fans on their side ...

[org: 12/07/2020] [rev: 12/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

For their quotas of power, for their plans to earn money and to remove political and social rivals. Although the results are immediate to their interests, time to time with the consequences. Everyone will end up paying the bill. Logic and reason, although they may take time to materialize, even decades, in the end always end up prevailing.

Greetings to ...

[org: 09/07/2020] [rev: 09/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Who keep the simulation on.

The economy of "Contactless" ...

[org: 09/07/2020] [rev: 09/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Is interested in a contactless society.

We live in a tremendously hypocritical society ...

[org: 09/07/2020] [rev: 09/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Where freedom of expression exists, but you can't say what you want. There is freedom of movement, but you cannot go where you want. There is freedom of action, but you cannot do what you want. There is a free market, but profits are privatized and losses are socialized. There is freedom of worship, but you cannot believe what you want and found an official religion. There is freedom of the press, but the media belongs to those who dictate the rules and it is not possible to publish what you want. There is the freedom to love, but you cannot love whoever you want. There is the freedom to die, but you cannot die as and when you want. There is the freedom to consume, but you cannot consume what you want. Etc ...

The only freedom that exists ...

[org: 09/07/2020] [rev: 09/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It is freedom of thought (by the moment). And only if you exercise it in silence.

Sometimes it is necessary to make them hate you, without realizing it ...

[org: 09/07/2020] [rev: 09/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

To make farewells easier. Since if they love you, being aware, they are likely to suffer more.

If the Universe is deterministic ...

[org: 09/07/2020] [rev: 09/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

So I write this because I have to. And but also.

The only possible emancipation ...

[org: 09/07/2020] [rev: 09/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It is through the workers struggle (and its consequent class struggle) and the identification of poverty as the unique problem to be solved and of savage capitalism, as its most direct cause. All the other derived policies (identity, gender, etc.), even if they are called "intersectional", are nothing more than other forms of fragmentation/atomization of forces (despite the fact that their purposes are legitimate and necessary) since they are convenient to the power, because in this way it prevents the union from being force, as long as there are tactical disputes between those who question it.

Capitalist society does not care ...

[org: 09/07/2020] [rev: 09/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Rich white, poor black. Rich black, poor white. Rich man, poor woman. Rich woman, poor man... In the end, everyone will be treated equally, depending on what they have.

A foolish slave ...

[org: 09/07/2020] [rev: 09/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Is the one who tries to liberate others, without having liberated himself/herself first, since in the end, surely he/she will not achieve either one or the other.

Those who invent a new political language ...

[org: 09/07/2020] [rev: 09/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Generally they do so, so that only they can speak and thus try to become essential, in any debate on their subject. It is the best way to perpetuate theirself through a speech, even if it lacks total logic or meaning, since for those who do not know it, it will always seem that they say something important.

The amount of innovation that is taking place is incredible ...

[org: 09/07/2020] [rev: 09/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Above all, in matters of human stupidity. It is a field that, year after year, never ceases to amaze.

I find it strange to believe ...

[org: 09/07/2020] [rev: 09/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

That I am alive for a certain purpose. And even more, that there is not even a purpose, for which to be alive.

It doesn't matter too much where you are ...

[org: 09/07/2020] [rev: 09/07/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Since it is precisely where you are.

Thank you ...

[org: 30/06/2020] [rev: 30/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

To all the heroes without cape. A billion thanks.

#Hacktivism: "We are your mothers" ...

[org: 30/06/2020] [rev: 30/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

"We never forget you". -> #CuentasDelPP #PPGoteras #ExpectUs ;-)

We will not be the first way of life to become extinct ...

[org: 30/06/2020] [rev: 30/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

But we will be the first to do it, consciously.

If, in the face of scientific evidence and facts, they resort to "feelings" ...

[org: 30/06/2020] [rev: 30/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

So you, immediately, must explain the difference between emotions and feelings. According to William James and Carl Lang (1884), the former are a chemical process, therefore, undeniable in any human being and must be assumed as such, since it is established within the framework of the evolutionary process. Precisely, an evolutionary framework adapted to times that travel to certain out-of-date constants, since you no longer live in a cave, some of the emotional responses are not in accordance with present times. As for the latter, they are a subjective and moralistic interpretation, before which, in the last instance, only the question of faith remains. That is, feelings are learned, they are mediated and therefore, they are controllable ... The main organ that regulates emotions (not feelings) is the amygdala, which also regulates, among others, memory, hunger and sexual instincts. It is therefore that some emotions can be treated as direct disorders and that others have a close relationship with those other "sensations". Sometimes mental problems are directly associated with problems with the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex. Precisely, it is the second, specifically, the frontal cortex, which gives us the ability to reason about the facts and not allow ourselves to be carried away by "instincts". Thanks to it, the human being is where he is and left the caves. And this is where a large part of the explanations for "sentimental reactions" lies. If in front of such an argument they do not change their position, you did not insist, those people are not prepared to understand it (even psycho-morphologically), and surely, knowing how the evolutionary processes of the brain work, despite being tremendously variable in humans in its primeval stages, it will not be in the near future, for example, in stages more typical of maturity. Unless, of course, you manage to educate these people with a new morality. In that case, go ahead.

When everyone does something ...

[org: 30/06/2020] [rev: 30/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It does not mean that it is the correct thing. Listen to your conscience. Do not get carried away by "today". Be strong. Make our planet a better place. Whatever it takes. The award is none other than the respect of someone who really matters. Your. And of all the people, who are still awake.

I wonder how much Co2 and No2 produce ...

[org: 30/06/2020] [rev: 30/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The RT (retweet), the collection of online signatures, the videos, the campaigns, etc... that precisely denounce the need to reduce Co2 and No2... and how many actually translate into changes in individual habits and collectives.

If you put a blind man to drive ...

[org: 30/06/2020] [rev: 30/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The strange thing is not to get out of the way.

If Google doesn't force you to fill captchas ...

[org: 29/06/2020] [rev: 29/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It is because it has very clear that you are a human.

Concept: Destroy ...

[org: 29/06/2020] [rev: 29/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Build in reverse.

Sometimes I'm building ...

[org: 29/06/2020] [rev: 29/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Other times I am destroying.

I don't understand why they call it "The New Normal" ...

[org: 29/06/2020] [rev: 29/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

When it's the same capitalist stupidity as always.

What does one rebellious fractal say to another? ...

[org: 29/06/2020] [rev: 29/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Down with the pattern (patron/boss)! ;-)

List of things that unite people ...

[org: 29/06/2020] [rev: 29/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

-Mom and Dad
-The navel
-The brain
-The heart
-The stomach
-Blood (and its color)
-The mystery
-The fear
-The wish
-The pleasure
-The planet

List of things that separate people ...


If you think "great" because someone like me has stopped talking to you ...

[org: 29/06/2020] [rev: 29/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It is because you have not understood your sentence.

When you have an IQ>145 ...

[org: 29/06/2020] [rev: 29/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It is practically impossible, even using mathematics, logic or reason, to affirm something, without hesitation, without nuances or even without being able to argue, quite the contrary. It is as you descend, that you come across increasingly accurate statements.

"I'm going to make it clear to you with just 2 words" ...

[org: 29/06/2020] [rev: 29/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

- "You are stupid"
- "That's 3 words"

Moral: When the wise man points to the moon, the fool looks at the finger.

What compile ...

[org: 29/06/2020] [rev: 29/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

To the compiler?.

Even the dogs ...

[org: 29/06/2020] [rev: 29/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Have dreams.

Capitalism grows strong ...

[org: 03/06/2020] [rev: 03/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Creating individuals without roots, without family, without a traditional (or even digital) origin, beyond the most superficial Nationalisms. In short, modeling individuals who have nothing really close to fight for or who even have it, they even get to perceive it from their mental bubble... They are a class of future workers, who cooperate in an atomized way, and who accept to live in a small and unworthy house, for a salary of misery. Since they have no other concerns, apparently, beyond themselves (and their huge egos). Precisely, the massive social networks and the use and way in which they are built, which currently contribute to a greater extent to the occurrence of this situation... Because anyone who has something real to fight for and who has not been adopted depending on their moral and ethical beliefs, or their educational level or tolerance to the constant bombardment of propaganda, such as, for example, the close people you love and trust, that will fight more for their Rights. Because to feed our sons and our daughters, anyone will fight, be that as it may, no matter where they come from and where they go... The very essence of the solution to intolerance and one of the most essential value of Humanity. The fight for survival as the engine and capitalism (its consequences and all derived policies and habits), as the main threat.

The only way to equality ...

[org: 03/06/2020] [rev: 03/06/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It is precisely, through difference.

Extending the idea that "fake news" exists ...

[org: 30/05/2020] [rev: 30/05/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Is also done from the perspective of creating a false sense that "true news" exists, on the contrary. And what is worse, that there may even be neutrality sources at some point.

With Big Brother installed ...

[org: 30/05/2020] [rev: 30/05/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The natural (including people, social relationships, passions, emotions, fun, leisure, etc.) becomes artificial, since the subjects (and their behaviors) are merely manipulated and the artificial (the imposed, the egocentric, the commodified, etc ...), a schizophrenic norm on which being naturally accepted depends.

A poem ...

[org: 28/04/2020] [rev: 28/04/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The final light,
will mark the battle,
that will face you,
to your soul fears,
a door ajar,
a trip away,
that will seem close to you.

#StayInHome until ...

[org: 22/04/2020] [rev: 22/04/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

You really have internalized in the miserable conditions in which we survive. Then, get organized and claim what is yours ...

Rights do not exist ...

[org: 20/04/2020] [rev: 20/04/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

What really exists are temporary privileges.

Every application that is created to control us ...

[org: 17/04/2020] [rev: 17/04/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It will be hacked to free us. #ExpectUs

When someone is asking to move back a chess move ...

[org: 16/04/2020] [rev: 16/04/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

I don't understand people who ask you to go back a chess move, when they were wrong. If you are not capable of making a firm decision and assuming the consequences, believe me, you will never learn one of the most important lessons that chess can offer you ...

Through a mathematical model ...

[org: 06/04/2020] [rev: 06/04/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

I have discovered a pattern in every country on the planet: "All governments are manipulators, who try to put the economy ahead of the health of their people and are, in good measure, complicit in ending a good part of the world population" ...

Society will change when the gods change ...

[org: 03/04/2020] [rev: 03/04/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

What makes money a god is its power to take nature away from the human being, in exchange for the sacrifice of ceasing to be, for being what is consumed. The curse of living being a product, produced to consume ...

The only consumer right should be ...

[org: 02/04/2020] [rev: 02/04/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Get the opportunity to stop being a consumer ...

Privacy: When someone asks you ...

[org: 01/04/2020] [rev: 01/04/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

"Why don't you want the State to spy on you, if Google, Facebook and Amazon do it every day?"... Actually, it's as if you were in the schoolyard, facing bullying and someone came and said to you: "Why not do you want Joe to beat you too, if Peter, Sarah and Tommy do it every day?". I suppose that a possible worthy and reasonable answer would be; "Well, actually I prefer that nobody hit me and if it is impossible for that to happen, due to bad habits or stupidity and the lack of education and self-control, I think that the less hit me and the softer, the better... Finally, I realize that; "Only an aspiring thug, a masochist or those who confuse; -I have nothing to hide- with: -I have nothing to contribute-, would love a similar situation"...

The architects of the New World...

[org: 31/03/2020] [rev: 01/04/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Tired of the continuous cycles of terror and frightened by the invisible enemy, who sneaks into their homes, through the air, through social contact, through the collective and through their television, the human beings, even thinking they were free before, succumb to the new Panopticon... Wretched, locked up under "law and violence" and without tools, they understand the world's wrong nightmare, through manipulated screens and non-scientific data, where other unreal beings narrate the reality. And overwhelmed, although happy, they accept brutality and ask for more security, more State and more control... The architects of the New World, own their destinies already...

8 fundamental principles to start an "anarchist organization" ...

[org: 27/03/2020] [rev: 27/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Anarchism, being a "theoretical cardinal point" and philosophical, therefore falls into the need to resolve and obtain some kind of deterministic vision of the human being. This implies that, finally, the direction of the most socially extended debate and in any discussion that mentions it, ends up drifting inexorably towards the fact that the adult subject, being able to have "malevolent" and simple replication behaviors, will never allow, even in an involuntary way, since it is constantly being manipulated and the interests of third parties, that any system with anarchist bases can work, since being representative of a social majority, it will always have the capacity to invalidate any other type of possibility of different organization. Coincidentally, this is an argument that goes hand in hand with seeing the need for the current "neo-pseudo-liberal" economic system, as the only form of social evolution possible for humanity as a whole. That is to say, everything ends up summarized in that, putting anarchism into practice is just another utopia... And this conclusion happens, mainly, because the classic bases of anarchism, very much in line with the most empathic socialism, understand the Human being, like a creature that is "good" by nature. And the most daily possible example, we can find it in the weakness with which we arrived at the world or in the "innocence" with which we began to walk, if for example, we compare ourselves with other species that surround us... This implies, furthermore, that classical anarchism therefore assumes and implicitly on its philosophical basis, that society (social organization) is a natural and spontaneous phenomenon. And it is precisely from there, where the idea derives that the State is a maximum tool for the exploitation of the mass and not only a means of representation, since it avoids that natural and constant development of society itself... In a certain way and at this point in the debate, one can only try to glimpse what the practical and realistic measures to follow can be in order to be able to organize in society, far from theories and chimeras. And that is where we sometimes find ourselves uncomfortable even with our own beliefs... My opinion is that; Anarchist (rather than anarchic) organizations, however, must be totally based on processes of autarky, constantly subject to self-regulation based on the most just ethics, and on innovation and creativity, both of altruistic and collective individuals, etc... I consider that, in addition, they can (or should) follow some kind of pattern, at least at the beginning, so that there is a certain consensus for its real implementation and so that certain necessary replication processes are activated to materialize it effectively and global. In other words, a series of principles that serve as a "basic guide" to try to establish organizational mechanisms that are broader and more inclusive each time, until finally being able to unite Humanity, for example, through one of its most basic causes, and necessary: "The survival of the species"... It also happens, and we must not forget it, that we generally tend to think that the change in Western society, for example, from savage Capitalism to Anarchism, must be total, global and immediate. However, my opinion is that it is a process that begins little by little, that goes from the bottom to the up, from the anonymous to the public, and starring the least expected people, who of course, end up doing something unthinkable (unpredictable ). And that, from there and at a certain point on the scale of their development and thanks to the natural capacity of the human being to imitate behavior and feelings, and even to their vital needs due to the circumstances of social reality in the one we live in, finally collaborate until it becomes exponential...

That said and in summary, the eight fundamental principles of modern "anarcho-pragmatic" theory, which must (or should) comply with any type of re-organization, are:
  • 1. Voluntary Organization (that meets, to a certain extent, the expectations and desires of the individual: "There will be those who like it and those who do not like to get up early. And therefore, there will be organizations where they get up early and where they don't."
  • 2. Functional Organization (that complies with the pragmatic-collective, with a unique and exclusive basis, in the survival in the best possible conditions, of the species)
  • 3. Temporary Organization (in constant change, of methodologies, although mainly of hierarchies and control agents)
  • 4. Small Organization (in scale, if it includes coexistence, groups of between 50 and 100 people maximum)
  • 5. Hyperconnected/Solidarity Organization (in scalability, between individuals and between organizations)
  • 6. Flexible Organization (with capacity to adapt to the particularities/wills of the individuals)
  • 7. Creative Organization (that cares for and enhances the most sensitive and necessary aspects of the human being)
  • 8. Revocable Organization (containing instruments for its elimination, own and external)

Locked up and without electricity ...

[org: 27/03/2020] [rev: 27/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Finally, the human being will be forced to face himself and reality ...

Do you hear that sound? ...

[org: 27/03/2020] [rev: 27/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It is savage Capitalism paving the roads of the future, with the corpses of our most needy people...

People against vaccines, during a global epidemic ...

[org: 26/03/2020] [rev: 26/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

At last "will learn" what the world is like, when ONE vaccine is missing...

3 goals for a healthy "quarantine" ...

[org: 20/03/2020] [rev: 22/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Obtain the vaccine, obtain the truth (from the problem’s origin, to the vaccine’s patent) and ensure that both reach every person in need on the planet. In any of them, in addition to your own security (and yourself), you should be working since everything started...

The wolf walks to the rhythm of the weakest, excepting ...

[org: 20/03/2020] [rev: 22/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

When the wolf pack stops, because it has been threatened. It is at that moment, and without a collective need for a mediation howl, that abandons his position and takes the initiative...

In the "bread and circuses" society ...

[org: 20/03/2020] [rev: 22/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The clowns are who laugh at the public and not the public that laughs at their show...

Some feelings about the functioning of today's society, to reflect ...

[org: 20/03/2020] [rev: 22/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The collective feeling (and even, due to the savage capitalist economic system, the most abounding belief) that there are social/individual behaviours that are not determinants at all in a collective (and therefore individual) plan of survival, is crystallizing. An assumption that will persist unless they manage to change their conscious state of reality, for example, overcoming the permanent "state of shock" that has been established... We are therefore in front of a majority of a society that, during a forced closure due to a pandemic state of alarm, in which they are prevented by "law and violence" from continuing to carry out their daily job routines, they only try to entertain themselves (or to keep distracted). Probably hoping that others will get them out of the problem to be able(and about this I have no doubt) to continue doing the same thing they did to date, without having to worry about anything else. Precisely, to maintain the same obsolete model of life that they had when they left home with the excuse of going to "work". And worst of all, ignoring the fact that a global pandemic is not just a "problem" caused by Nature, but to a large extent, by an inefficient system also governed by a reflection of the worst people in Humanity...

It is not difficult to relocate a King ...

[org: 15/03/2020] [rev: 22/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

First of all, keep him a few years in prison, while he gives back everything who has stolen from society. Secondly, the moment he gets out of jail, he receives an assignment directly from the public coffers and even on an honorary basis, the minimum retirement pension that humble work received at the time he reigned. From there, we can consider him relocated...

During a global house arrest due to a pandemic ...

[org: 15/03/2020] [rev: 22/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

It is easier to know what professions and professionals or individuals are essential for individual and collective survival. We can make use of this in the future, if we overcome the crisis, to be able to rebuild the personal and social priorities system and reward/strength certain sectors. As well as to restructure the market, redesign how it operates (to avoid falling into the same mistakes) and fully renew its actors. In other words, it must be used to finally end the acceptance of suffering caused by the savage chimera of Capitalism.

9 measures for a sanitary "quarantine" ...

[org: 10/03/2020] [rev: 22/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

  • Step 1: Search/Add; to your Constitution: "All the wealth of the country in its different forms and whatever its ownership is subordinated to the general interest."
  • Step 2: Provide; Hospitals with public resources (and supervise the good use of them), without restrictions.
  • Step 3: Extend; Step 2 to: Justice and Education.
  • Step 4: Locate; publicly expose and after a fair trial, try to put in jail, all the corrupt and fraudster people of your local village, who have privatized, tried to privatize or collaborated in the privatization, of Universal Health System.
  • Step 5: Take care; of yourself, your people and the animals and environment around you.
  • Step 6: Watch; your levels of consumption, citizenship and education, and those of your people.
  • Step 7: Get ready; (mentally and physically) for a state of permanent control/exception (global/local).
  • Step 8: Wash; yourself hands, as many times as necessary.
  • Step 9: Enjoy; the new dystopia. The world has changed ...

Social pandemia ...

[org: 09/03/2020] [rev: 09/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

They create a superficial, unscientific, individualistic, materialistic and selfish society, day by day and for decades, and when there is a global pandemic that requires cooperation, solidarity and empathy, they ask that same society to collaborate for the common good...

A tip ...

[org: 08/03/2020] [rev: 08/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Public opinion is not the same as published opinion.

When the objective of the company is ...

[org: 24/02/2020] [rev: 22/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The maximum benefit, the greatest growth and in the most efficient way, being the winning trend to achieve the monopoly of the market, to continue applying the regulations according to the law of the supply and demand chain, even on the essential goods, should not be considered economic (neo)Liberalism, but genocide...

If your government tells you...

[org: 23/02/2020] [rev: 23/02/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

  • "to remain calm" -> Try to run away!
  • "to run away" -> Try to remain calm!

What happens to Freedom of Expression?

[org: 23/02/2020] [rev: 22/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Freedom of expression is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of reprisals, censorship or subsequent sanction. That is, it is a measure, in the form of law, that seeks to ensure possible future action. And nothing more. However, in many occasions, it is a somewhat compromised law, since it is used in the form of a throwing weapon against political rivals, to justify some actions. Freedom of expression, although beautiful and poetically sweet, and a laudable goal to fight for, also hides a dark face, which perverts it and can end up being a drag, and even a condemnation for society. Should people say what comes to mind? Yes. What's more, being a douchebag, a fool or even a stupid (understood in its old-Greek form) shouldn't be a crime. Nothing that does not serve to curtail future action should be. In addition, what is the use of freedom of expression but there is no freedom of conscience or development of critical thinking?. What is the need of having thousands of people, exercising their right to freedom of expression, if all they do is to repeat a mantra?... If there is no prior reflection, consensus and capacity for self-criticism, freedom of expression can be like the effect of a boomerang. You can use it in your favour, but it will always be used against you. That means that the "noise" increases and the few voices that sometimes detail the visible paths where we should move forward, end up being diluted between murmurs, generally disqualifying and with little or nothing culturally and educationally, to contribute. Sometimes the "victim" is not who is said to be offended, but the rest of the Society, for allowing an individual to feel offended by such stupidity. The lack of freedom of expression is fought. And the excess, too. It is precisely in the second where you can find a much more appropriate window to develop reason and individual and collective thinking, critical and self-regulating. Precisely, so that this freedom and its form of expression, in itself, is extended. And where before there was no or vice versa. Finally, just as there is the right to "say what one wants," which many people have recently used to exercise their mediocrity in public, there should also be the right to "shut up when you want" fade away, stay and live another way of life. And to be able to include, among other measures and freedoms to take advantage of, the possibility of stopping to participate in slave systems, in spying methods through technologies and overpopulation, or in financing wars, corruption and suffering, for others to fill their pockets with money (even, in the name of their own freedom of expression) and the "common sense" (not conscience) of evil.

Parasitic system

[org: 18/02/2020] [rev: 18/02/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

The System can be defined, perfectly, as; a "hive-lobby" of parasites, created by and for parasites, whose only great qualities are; the enormous amount of parasites it harbors and the way in which it is perpetuated, through the use of parasitism.

Vindictive logic

[org: 18/02/2020] [rev: 22/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

I can go one by one, but for lack of time,
and because not everyone deserve the same time,
I will go against everyone, as if it was one by one.

Natural disorder of life

[org: 18/02/2020] [rev: 28/02/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

Nature prefers disorder by probability. That is why; "She" does not teach you how to live in order, but how to die in disorder.

It's only possible to really share...

[org: 18/02/2020] [rev: 22/03/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

If it is done from anonymity. Everything else is a dress for the ego and sometimes, even some kind of tax relief.

"Smart" = Spy

[org: 16/02/2020] [rev: 16/02/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

SmartPhone = SpyPhone
SmartTV = SpyTV
SmartWatch = SpyWatch
SmartCity = SpyCity
SmartContract = SpyContract
SmartGym = SpyGym
SmartCar = SpyCar
SmartHome = SpyHome

As on the chess board...

[org: 08/02/2020] [rev: 08/02/2020] by psy [03c8.net]

"The King makes the squares around him vulnerable."

A note...

[org: 27/12/2019] [rev: 27/12/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

"Angry people, click more."

A cite...

[org: 07/07/2019] [rev: 08/07/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

"The only true desire behind a human is; to be able to govern his own life."


[org: 18/05/2019] [rev: 22/03/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

"When feudalist slavery was abolished, there was also an increase in social conflict. It is what abolish privileges has."

"The corrupt, fear us. The honest, support us. The heroic, join us."

[org: 07/05/2019] [rev: 22/03/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."Saving work to others... on the pragmatic but also on the more massive as possible survival plan... way"...

A list ordered about classical Anarchism:
  1. Each individual has jurisdiction over their own body
  2. Does not allow or justify aggressive and coercive authority in the conduct of relations between individuals
  3. Rejects the state as it is an inherently harmful institution that claims monopoly on the use of force
  4. Does not demand that the individual conform to society, rather than society should conform to the individual
  5. Acknowledges that each individual has the natural right to defend themselves, their community, and their justly acquired property from aggression
  6. Ensure tolerance of all peaceful voluntary exchanges between individuals, and acknowledges that theft, taxation, and expropriation are inherently aggressive
  7. Is not about chaos but rather the absence of the state and centralised political authority

"Basic and historical foundations, principles and schools of Anarchism"

[org: 24/11/2019] [rev: 25/11/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."In a summarized way"...

Unlike other economic or political systems, such as Socialism, or Monarchy, Anarchism is not a static social system, or a doctrine, but rather, it is a theoretical cardinal point, a direction to focus on the advances of society... Anarchism is postulated in a definite way, at the time of the Enlightenment (17th century). In the "Discourse on Inequality", Jean-Jacques Rousseau, criticizes the institutions that allow the powerful to subdue to the weak, especially the Monarchy and the clergy. At the same time, Immanuel Kant, defines the concept of Freedom as; "a basic condition to acquire maturity". Therefore, we can explain why society is (and is being) "infantilized", mainly, because it has not been able to develop in Freedom (also, because it is more easily manipulated)... Alexander Von Humboldt, considers that such development is not possible due to compulsory work, that is, that which is necessary to perform in order to survive, but is not part of the worker's ambitions. That is, all work that does not come from an individual desire that drives it; "With Freedom as a condition, every peasant can rise to an artist, love his work, improve it with his creativity and that will cultivate his intellect and exalt his pleasure." Therefore, we can say that the direction of the theoretical cardinal point is Freedom. According to Noam Chomsky, the ideals of Anarchism have been "perverted", to justify Liberalism and by definition, Capitalism. In fact, the Liberals used Anarchism to repeal the power of the Aristocracy, which at that time, even allowed slavery or caste systems. With the excuse of freedom of entrepreneurship, although social rights improved, then other types of oppression were put into practice through work. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon considered that "while the means of production were in private hands, the exploitation of the weak by the strong would persist." In his book "The Conquest of Bread", Piotr Kropotkin explains how Capitalism thrives thanks to poverty and exploitation and it is convenient for it to continue to exist... Think of two equal human beings, but one has inherited some land and the other has not. The owner of the land, can offer work to those who do not have it, who have no choice but to accept for eating/survival. It happens that, the owner of the land, can sell the products that his workers produce, in addition to keep possesing the land in exchange for offering a salary to the worker, who being intangible goods, need to be exchanged for goods and therefore, act as a debt unless they are changed as soon as possible. This is how the accumulation of wealth occurs and therefore, inequality. And that is why Anarchism is against the accumulation of capital. Precisely this same conclusion is shared, both from Marxism, and from Anarchism. But, while the Socialists like Lenin, thought that the means of production should be controlled by the government, the anarchists like Bakunin, insisted that the same organized workers were the ones who should have the land, the tools and the factories... Anarchism also seeks to get away from dogmatism (for example, Communism), which is why even Pierre-Joseph Proudhon wrote to Karl Marx: "Let's not become leaders of a new religion"... Emma Goldman, one of the mothers of the Anarcha-Feminisms, were very disappointed with the revolution that the Marxists were carrying out and wrote the book: "My Disillusionment in Russia", where she explained how in the end, if the Nation-State controlled the means of production, the workers continued being alienated... We can say that: "An Anarchist is a Socialist who wants to abolish all unfair hierarchy and all forms of domination," that is why, anarchists believe that the social organization must get rid of the Nation-State, since precisely, it is an unfair form of social domination... As a rule, Anarchism believes in Democracy, but distrusts the elections, since, if the people who vote do not have all the information, ballot boxes and votes, only benefit the rich and the powerful. Mikhail Bakunin: "Representative democracy, instead of being a guarantee for the people, helps perpetuate an 'Aristocracy' in power"... According to Leo Volin; "Anarchism is not only about chaos, but about an order that is not imposed by force and from above, but through cooperation, in a free and social way, but above all, built from below"... That is, the anarchists believe that people should not be at the service of the Nation-State, but that the Nation-State should be the people themselves... In general, the ideas of Anarchism are considered "radical", both by capitalists and by socialists, as they seek dismantle all power structures, all imposed hierarchy, including those that Liberalism considers "good", such as wage labor. Or also, because Anarchism makes use of direct action, mainly as a form of propaganda, but also, to demonstrate that it is still possible to bend the power structures... In order to not enter into contradictions, anarchists are not organized through political parties, it is therefore that anarchists have to use all means outside the system to be able to make their ideas progress in a pragmatic way... As for example currently, "hacktivism" or strikes and boycotts... Finally, there are those who consider Anarchism as a utopia and in a certain way, it is so, since for it to work, it is necessary that people respect the order coming from the inside of the individual rather than viceversa, as is the case today. That is, for Anarchism to be tested, a radical global change and an enormous effort to educate and cultivate the mind and critical thinking are needed...

The principles of Anarchism could be summed up in:
  • Solidarity
  • Cooperation
  • Equity
  • Justice
  • Freedom
And the schools of Anarchism in:
  • Mutualist (Anarcho-Mutualism)
  • Trade Unionist (Anarcho-Unionismm)
  • Collectivist (Anarcho-Collectivist)
  • Feminist (Anarcha-Feminism)
  • Economist (Anarcho-Capitalists)
  • Green (Anarcho-Ecologism)

In modern Democracy, the most effective way to vote is...

[org: 11/11/2019] [rev: 14/11/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."Not having a bank account."

What happens to Nationalism?

[org: 14/11/2019] [rev: 15/11/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."From an allegorical point of view"...

Imagine that your mind is like a butterfly, that wants to fly and expand, in order to grow. In the beginning, the ideas and reasons that Nationalism gives, can act like a fresh wind that drives us to know a little more about all things, our closest environment, our language, our people ... However, it comes a moment when it becomes a closed box. A place for the mind from which it is no longer possible to expand further. Nationalism (or state-nation concept), like physical borders, is a limited space. The idea of "state-nation", in itself, is nothing more than a simplistic idea of classifying and categorizing, probably, due to the fact that we do not have enough conscious time to know all the people on the planet. That is why we tend to group and create "tribes." However, the bio-genetic concept that unites us, printed and replicated in each of our cells, indicates that we are part of the same stuff. That we come from the same place. That is why, limiting the mind to an ideological concept such as that of the nation (even bypassing the tyranny that it implies as a system), does nothing but curb other expansive possibilities more interesting and surely more beneficial, both for the individual and for Humanity as a whole. Perhaps, people are confusing the concept of nation with the one of custom... Scientists have explained to us in a very simple way that our learning, from birth to adulthood, has different phases and that is influenced, in one way or another, by those ideas and experiences that we have go through. Moreover, at certain times, they can be decisive to form the "reason." That is why we try to implement educational policies adapted, not only to our own knowledge, but to the emotionality we have at the time of acquiring it. Tribalism, prior to the concept of Nationalism, is perhaps a more important feeling, especially in childhood, because it shows us what surround us, our people, our family, our food, our sports, etc., and makes us appropriate and be part, collectively, in some way, of all this, getting to prioritize it before anything else, simply, because it is more accessible than others or because we think it is part of our identity or DNA. These are, then, the walls of our box. It is true that Nationalism can be seen from the point of view of war, and therefore, it is an interesting tactic, but the history of civilizations has shown us that without cooperation, there is no possible evolution. That you cannot live in a bubble alien to the inclemency of destiny, to "markets", to people. You can survive for a while, but in the end, the slab of the "external" always ends up being heavier. Therefore, the concept of nation-state can be defined as a childish concept. Or belonging to a learning acquired during childhood or adolescence. Hence, we must understand Nationalism, and therefore, the concept of nation-state, as a limiter. A mechanism of social control. And there will be those who think that, it is much better to be controlled by people close to or similar to oneself, than by outside or outside people. I don't know, personally I think that; "I hope someone like me doesn't have to control me"... Nations are control methods based on fear and distraction. They are a way of diverting attention from mental, physical and spiritual (or common sense) problems, but above all, they are a way to silence reason. A flag, a symbol, are actually the wild cards that are used to divert attention from the only subject that should be important and around which our own social organization revolved; the survival of the species and its environment... I will try to explain it through a metaphor: Imagine that there is a cake cut into 6 pieces and that there are 5 people around it, all of them, representatives of a nation. In the beginning, everyone can take a piece in the same way and even a piece that they can save, dispose of or even negotiate what to do with it. At that time, when there is a surplus, one of the participants says that they should create a symbol to represent the cake, since everyone's best interest depends on it and therefore, think, debate and make politics around it. It seems like a good idea, says another participant, because that way we don't directly touch the cake (since it can get dirty, it can fall and we all lose the possibility of eating, etc.). Everyone, except one of the participants, agrees that from now on, the cake will be a concept of the mind called, the "big cookie." At that time, everyone begins to debate the concept, drawings and schemes are made to represent it, colors are put on, hymns are made, etc. and some begin to say that they "feel" the "cookie" as a more special part of themselves, for reasons such as that, milk, for example, that has served to make it, comes from a place. Others, on the other hand, say that they don't like the "cookie" very much, because they prefer other colors, their symbols are ugly and also avoid the attention of the piece that is free. Finally, the participant who does not want to participate in the symbols, also ends up talking about them, mainly, to try to give the original importance to the cake, not to the "cookie", especially because it was his position from the beginning. .. Well, with all this fuss, about the "cookie", in the end, it happens, that all participants, in one way or another, and as time goes by, end up forgetting the cake. What it was like, how they shared it at the beginning, what flavor it had. Even, they end up forgetting that the cake must be food in order to survive and begin to look for ways to eat through the "cookie". But this, being a concept of the mind, directly clashes with the logic and physics of reality. "As much as I draw a "cookie" on paper, in an employment contract, in a bank account and then I eat it, it doesn't look like the cake at all. And worst of all, it doesn't feed me". That is why hunger is always there, perpetually. Nationalism is the idea of dividing the cake into pieces and creating symbols to talk about them. And without a doubt, if don't become a supra-Nationalism, even if it is ideological, based on empathy and the fundamental strategic principle of survival that, "unity is strength," the only thing you get is that in the end nobody eats , or whoever does it, has to do it alone. And there is nothing sadder, than not being able to share the food with someone different. Or a good conversation. Or a game of chess. Or mathematics and music ... Concepts to which nations never come by themselves. It is the different people in the world who make them up. Nationalism tends to enclose the mind in a position that is too limited and easily manipulated, even from the force that generates fear (to be different, to resemble that of the outside ...) that inexorably derives to the mind wilting, confining it to the logic of manners and actually forgetting, precisely, the origin of your own being. Thus the mind withers. So the butterfly stops flying. Perhaps, if you are a conformist person, with having a limited cage in which to move, it is enough for you. But, what surely happens to you is that your wings will never have a beautiful and different color, since inside the box you cannot get light and you will never have a mutation that makes them change. Many other butterflies will stop looking at you, even because their vision will have changed, to be able to exclusively detect those with striking colors so to go fly with them. And there you will stay, with other butterflies just like you, even in the feeling of wanting to have better colors than the others. That is, in the end you will be alone, within loneliness. Much better to get carried away by the lack of borders, both physical and mental. Because we already know that: "without limits there is no control and without control, there will be no fear.". And because anyone who has traveled a little knows that the best way to do it (and to learn) is, precisely, without fear...

What happens with Capitalism?

[org: 18/05/2019] [rev: 10/08/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."Being very brief, without exposing pragmatic ideas, plans, actions, etc... and trying not to go too deeply into extensive debates, or that have already been exposed by others and in several ways... but rather, contributing to fundamental concepts and explaining the differences in some common errors"...

So, What happens with Capitalism?... With Capitalism happens that: "if something is -gratis- and it is not -libre/natural-, you are the product!". Also happens that: "there are only two possible role-players in this game, "slave" and "master", and another has already chosen before you"... From my point of view, there is an important argument when we talk about Capitalism that we shouldn't easily discard and is that: "to abolish Capitalism is not the end". At least, if we try to think about it, from the anarchist perspective and without falling into some common confussion, which is generally related with having only access to the theory and the lack of practice. We can use a practical situation as an example. You are talking with a (neo)Liberal/Capitalist, who openly supports financial or mercantilist capitalism putting into risk important pilars of your own ideology, and suddenly you realize you feel really confused noticing that some of the practices are very similar. For example, the idea of a "free market". Moreover, both ideologies have in common that they do not want the figure of a centralized government. Here is where the debate is usually stopped and some people heads already exploded, normally falling into the fallacy of thinking that: "opposed ideologies are finally equal". I think that nobody clearly says, at least from the anarchist perspective that, although we have apparently similar economic purposes and we can share some theories/practices with other ideologies, including the ones seemingly antagonistic, what differentiates us fundamentaly from them is the future plan we follow to achieve it. And of course, the methods used to achieve it. In fact, the Liberalism theory generally wants to remove the state so that it stops regulating minimum wages, controlling inflation, etc... ending the social and working regulations to protect the workers. Anarchists should take care about "only" wanting to remove the state, if the economic system used after that has no changed. Because then, the level of slavery generated by a purely technocratic system can be infinitely worst... There are people who do not differentiate a Liberal from an Anarcho-capitalist, however there are many differences. For example, although Anarcho-capitalists are also governed by the supply and demand law, in theory, they are willing to put in place mechanisms to avoid the concentration of wealth, since this generates hierarchies. It is rare, therefore, to see Anarcho-capitalists organizing themselves with the rigid structures "from top to bottom", with which the capitalists are usually organized. On the other hand, there are also from the schools of Anarchy, the Anarcho-collectivists, who use another form of Capitalism for their economic system, but in its more social version. Such as ones that try to share barter or surplus between the community, trying to provide similar development opportunities for each human being. These groups are those that generally promote a Universal Basic Income for each human being, in the case of the almost completion of the increasing automation process. Of course, they are in favor of executing interventionist policies, as opposed to free-market ideas. Therefore, they are practically opposed to Anarcho-capitalists, since they will try to impose as few control measures as possible on the flow of people, goods and services, except when strictly necessary to avoid situations of oligopoly or monopoly... In conclusion: "I think that upcoming Capitalism will be 'The Gamificated Global Society of Roles & Rules' which will probably be implemented using a more "Eco-" or more "Green-" justification, but Capitalism anyway. With the threat to become a much darker system for workers and where to loose freedoms we have already been fought for. As with earth's human overpopulation, that can imply another new system of slavery for every individual mind and body, in which the subsistence will look collective, but the struggle for survival will remain individual, as ever. So again, everything will change but to remain the same"...

What happens with Work?

[org: 16/05/2019] [rev: 10/07/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."In the way of working"...

Work is part of life, an important experience for individuals and a possible efficient path for a hypothetical collective evolutionary survival plan, but it does not free/develop a human-sapiens, fully. At least, the work as it is understood today and the way it has evolved, as if it has evolved so far. It simply maintains and provides uncomfortable states for the body, the mind and our common sense. Because work involves to all of us. Work provides some bad habits that conditioning the entire existence. And then life becomes rougher. Sometimes, if there is a criterion in the investment of resources, your life may improve in some ways, even on a personal development way, but you will still have given your time to the project of others, which may not be useful for your will, if it has no sense for yourself or if it is not related with another larger collective plan that includes you at some point. Or even, if these projects go against yourself and yours. We live in the age of connected emotions. Including empathy. Time is the unique thing that should matter to a person before money. "Worker, citizen... is time to fight for your time". Something that can be translated as an objective and a meaning of life. With the responsibility that it has for those who deliver it, the fact of only having one. The work is something very serious.. And this may be interesting, this would be an ideal situation, I may belonging to the group is a fundamental feature of the human being. However, the cohesion of that group is based on something as weak as current employment system and all the bureaucracy that hides the conditions, rights and obligations of every worker. You lose an energy, an impulse, that starts from the inside and that the hackers know well what I mean, that makes us advance in a somewhat special way and in many occasions, with an intellectual development in accordance with the data and projects in which we are usually involved. Companies strive to reach these situations, promoting tasks and group situations and seeking optimal harmony between people, through their human resources offices. And it is usually when governments participate with their dark projects, that everything becomes a nightmare for the humble worker. It is precisely in certain emotional deceptions, where the idea of the joint project is diluted, perhaps even with an interesting purpose for Humanity, the rest of species, the planet, etc... Sometimes, with saying that it is about the human condition, it seems that the problems are diluted, but it is not so. They make them bigger. Something that does not abound. But even if this happened, even so, the individual will not find full self-relation, which satisfies the inner fire that every human being carries, even from birth: to explore, play, learn and know. The real human condition... In the chain of the current working system, several of these emotional and philosophical links are lost. And these are fundamental for the happiness of the individual. So, only the perpetual agony remains with the thought that there is no other way to escape than working. This thought, is a clamp for the mind, that comes to collapse or even to disconnect the matter of their being, being therefore alienated. And the result is that ordinary people end up acting like passive workers subjected to perpetual suffering, being victims and executioners, since they collaborate directly and indirectly, to maintain a model of collective development that puts into practice a modern system of slavery. One who has multiple heads and exploits old selfish background theories and that only provides a survival plan for a few. Or some even not even that, since they are content to have a few coins to hug when the ship sinks. There are people who is feeding the darkest places of the human being and being part of the problem and not of the solution. I hope they can change their destiny, soon!. It is a pity what happens with humanity at the beginning of this century. A large part is doing useless work or that can be simply replaced. And another, in addition, putting at risk his life and that of his loved ones. It's terrible!. We walk towards extinction on earth, while we seek to conquer other worlds, so that it may provide a few the possibility of escape. It is a selfish plan. Although evolutionarily fits. As it happens with what was explained above, it will carry an immense burden of responsibility, where new, forgetfulness will be the solution and restless minds, who discover it. But we still go so badly. We have reduced as Humanity, some parameters of poverty and mortality, drastically. But still, we know that we are capable of doing better and we still do not do it. A lot of things can change from one day to the next. That is the direction in which we must work. These are the processes that should be speed-up. Whether as a hobby, professionally, etc. If you can earn your daily bread and point to the right side, you'll see how it changes up to taste. A delight!. But until then, work less and more slowly for some and start to contribute by working on the development of the others ways. The change does not have to be drastic, unless you're a mountain climber or you like extreme emotions... The boycott may be not deliver your project on time, arrive late to places, delay money. And of course, do not accept unacceptable contracts. Always keeps the dignity. Even, use it as a tool. Claim your individuality, through the collective and protect both of them. Sometimes, before to go to a collective demonstration, it is necessary to make 2 or 3 individual demonstrations at home. Connect the places of work, of struggle, of ideas... There is work to spare. It is a matter of changing the prism in which main goal: perpetual profit is focused. You see it?. And if the bread does not arrive, we will see where it is stuck and unclog it, quickly!. The work is not the end. But neither the means. May work be that which we abolish. What the machines knew how to do. That human beings knew how to govern. The greatest achievement of Humanity, past the ancient era. A new era really begins, when the next day you do not have to work and you can have, assured, a personal and collective growth space, well managed and safe. But there is no magical life. These words do not work. And it may even be a utopia to even think about it. But, I believe that the basic idea on the question of work, would be to answer the question: Do we work in the right direction, towards the just and correct end?. Do I do something, on an individual level, in the same direction?. While it is true is that the work may not reveal the meaning of life, nor save us at the last minute through the clemency of some God. It may serve as a focusable tool, collectively and individually, towards wiser objectives, being in operation as it is. Maybe we do not have to unmake everything, but redirect/reproject/reinvent it and, therefore, this will save us preciously, work. I mean, to exploit it on a most efficient way for a more inclusive collective survival plan. In any case, in a pragmatic way and although it sounds paradoxical, in the epoch in which we live, it's time to work. But being the priority you and the people you love. And if you are not for yourself, or you can fall easily on egoistic or narcissistic conditions, or even you do not have people to love, which is a really sad situation and I am so sorry, at least do it for this precious planet that has allowed us to know each other. And if you're crazy do it even for me, but please, do not try to give me more work than I already have because a good example for a path when talking about the work is working, but also saving work to others. Cheer up!...

What about the Existence?

[org: 08/08/2019] [rev: 09/08/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."From the point of view of knowledge... and nothing else"...

What is the point of trying to explain everything?. Well, in the beginning, it is interesting for Humanity, as a whole, to follow this strategy, especially, because being so dependent on its environment, knowing is vital. Can we explain everything? I do not think so. If our large-scale environment, for example, the Universe, is how it seems it is, there are many events that are "lost" to our time and our spatial possibility, and therefore to be interpreted by us. We perceive its consequences or deduce its existence. We even simulate it. But there are turning points, where you get to the next state, and nothing else... it is just a new state of conditions and the beginning of more questions. "I know that I know nothing," it's still a great expression, to whose nuance you can add, "I just know that, on certain issues, I won't know anything"... And I say, Humanity, as a whole, because if we were dedicated to fully sharing knowledge and not to compete, or to fight, constantly, our legacy would be stronger and also our abilities to solve even greater mysteries. However, the socratic paradox seems perpetual and some people only see the common enemy as the only remedy before extinction... But if we know nothing, why then keep looking?. Because even so, doing it allows us to move forward in time, but also in space. If we train a cultured, critical, supportive and good-feeling Humanity, it is likely that they (and maybe we) can face future challenges much better. Also, whether it's get or not, at least there will be memories, in the form of energy and information, that our species tried bravely. Well, assuming that the Universe will not do a reset from time to time. That would be, on the other hand, the triumph of Nihilism. Who knows, maybe another Humanity, can access those files, and even get freed. This seems a better reason to be proud, than a flag, a skin color, a condition or any other symbol built to silence the most existential doubts. Poor uncultured mind, that although "happier" than the cultivated mind, its fear of destiny is immensely greater. Educate yourself, even to fight fear, and ignorance, by itself, will disappear...

What happens with Reality?

[org: 08/07/2019] [rev: 09/08/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."From a quantum physics perspective"...

If there is entropy, explained as the natural tendency towards disorder, but there is also the possibility to reverse the arrow of time, as quantum physics suggest, then there should be entropy towards the past. That means that in theory, we should perceive states of disorder also towards the past. However, our psychological and biological perception indicates only the disorder exclusively in one direction (the so called "future"). This could mean that the arrow of time is not fulfilled, or that the theory of entropy (S=k.logW) has still mysteries to solve... But if the arrow of time can work in both directions, that is, that reality can be rewound, just as it is advance (like a film), but we have the perception of progressive time then, there must therefore be some kind of "regulator/rule/etc.". Perhaps, it is close to the properties of light (maybe, in the same way that a hologram works on a mirror, whose reality, becomes a kind of "shadow theater"). Or hidden into the gravity (maybe close to current theories about wormholes, or other theories, like for example, the existence of a "natural" switch that allows to "on/off" gravity properties, for example, according to the demand of the equilibrium of the whole system). These regulators could maybe allow to "balance" space-time, over something static (not a line in movement). A really "now", or momentum, or "happening", but whose process does not interfere in the whole system, almost to our current present perception (so changes are done in another dimension/s). That means that the reality that we are percieving is just a reflection and it works like a mirror. Therefore, we can only be aware of the symptoms of reality and not of its cause or origin. It would be like holding a spoon in your hand and shaking it vigorously. That very effect, I believe, defines the vibration of space-time that explains some important concepts about "reality". We can perceive the spoon and its movement, even measure its mass, its acceleration, its speed, etc, but we can not see the origin of its movement. A "hand" that really waves it. The real "Big Bang"... Therefore, my conclusion is as follows: "The excess energy that emerges from entropy is compensated by the energy that constantly moves nature, based on the fact that it is always in continuous energy functioning. And that, the surplus of entropic energy of everything, is what really expands the universe. I can also say that, according to the behavior of atoms in the "half-life" process, the probability of existence of a fifth dimension is quite high. A receiving or mirror-shaped dimension, which allows the exchange of energy and information, towards the ones currently discovered"...

What is the Consciousness?

[org: 01/12/2019] [rev: 03/12/2019] por psy [03c8.net]

... "From an explanatory point of view" ...

Consciousness can be described as; a heterogeneous and ubiquitous supra-real entity, which can be divide itself and fold on itself, as well as, expand or extend itself, at various speeds, which has no beginning, no end, although it experiences mutations that define past, present and future states, and that can be contained despite being in everything, including the barriers that contain it ... From the mechanistic perspective, we can say that consciousness; It has a gear. At least one that helps us to, from one of its specific points, the one that unites us as human beings, to try to model a moderately understandable scheme over the others, based on the fact that, consciousness is unlimited, but the fraction of consciousness that we experience as human beings is not. Therefore, as a being of limited consciousness (at least from the basis and generally, ignoring that it can be expanded to the unlimited), trying to apply some abstract reverse engineering and own experience acquired to at least, obtain a clear and scientific-phylosophic approach to the fractional limits of consciousness. To simplify; Consciousness is one, which is composed of many, and it is not always the same, despite being eternally the same. When we use the term "human being", in which, we speak of all its "being" in a logical and context-specific assumption, we include all the organisms and tissues that compose it, from your most biological layer, to the matrices of abstract perception or even the emotions. Thus, we speak of being in its entirety, including the temporary transition of its continent, the “human body” and its level of conscious experience, that remains as a logically accessible part of the acquired consciousness . This results in a system of categorization of concepts, very typical of our being, which gives us different "levels", although they are not practiced on any table. That is to say, they are levels that are reached or not and where there is no "bottom" and "top", nor a "left" or "right", since, consciousness expands in all directions equally along with the construction of space-time, as another level of human descriptive abstraction, in parallel and in accordance with the laws of Nature. That is, consciousness is part of evolution, and part of the natural plan, since, what we understand as evolution, is nothing more than the narrative result of the passage of time, according to the fraction of consciousness to which every human being has access, to try to justify this same knowledge, which allows us to continue raising the question itself, with the passing of time and generation after generation. We can say that, conciousness has all the answers, but still keep asking to itself all the questions, completing all the possible answers and even without the need that there is a question or an express reason to ask. Consciousness dwells in everything, although the fraction of which we are aware in the plane we are living is limited. Limits that do not know that controls and that have been imposed by the immediate supra-conscience to it or others or ultimately, by the only that really exists. Limits that, in the same way, it handles over those immediately below to it. There is, therefore, a chain of consciousness, which are intertwined and that define each perceptual level, according to their being. That is to say, it is not the same, a divine consciousness (to put a name), than a human one, than that of a dog, although all are participants in it. Their conscious levels are encapsulated in the roles that define them, within the natural plan of evolution, as of those other higher consciences that, in a fractal way and without beginning, or end, handle these limits, as do all the others...

How to use the Truth?

[org: 04/05/2019] [rev: 19/05/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."In the age of lies and fake news"...

Imagine that you could change the value of things. Suddenly, things for which you have paid £10, its real value is actually 2000 years. Try to hold that power for a while. Use your lateral thinking ability. Imagine that you can base what you have on other parameters different from their cost in the market, for example, others looking at conditions more related to the environmental balance. Use the ecological footprint for this mental game. Or the cost in time. Now, look around you. Imagine that you change that prism. What do you have?. Now, imagine that everyone does it. What do you see?. Do you have a plan for when you have fulfilled your plan?... The objects are what we project that we want them to be. An object is, but it can also be. It is whoever perceives the object that projects its function. Just as the Impressionists conceive art. A hammer is only a tool. And a tool grants a power. Power corrupts. Power has a cost. A responsibility. A hammer is worth its ecological footprint, plus the responsibility of whoever uses it and to use it. Now, think on weapons. Or the Internet. Or think in money, itself. Each object is a compendium of truths. The rest is a matter of learning to use them... "We are not anyone's tools. You are your own tool. The tool is not the end. And the truth but also the opposite of the truth, are just tools. The truth is not the end, but it is a way. No one governs the truth but some are closer than others. The truth is learned. A single truth can contain lies. If the truth does not exist, it governs the lie. The only truth is its non-existence. And, the objects always tell the truth"...

When "playing chess"...

[org: 30/05/2019] [rev: 18/06/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."A message for a Dalai Lama"...

Hi, mr. D. Lama. I am writing you because I think your religion is the one that has some sense from a mathematical perspective. Also, because this is a message for the future and probably other religions will be hardly relevant at that time, hehe... Look, when I am compassionate while "playing chess" with people I do not know, at least when we start playing, if at some point the situation becomes against me, nobody accepts draw as a worthy ending, with its consequent learning... At least, during the finite and limited number of times I have interacted with others being compassionate, you know, when playing this game. All of them took advantage of the occasion and nobody acted, for example, in the same way I did in first place, remembering to return compassion, with compassion. Rebooting the "compassion's marker" implied in the game. Isn't this a "universal rule", or something already given by "common sense"?. It would be interesting if that were so, because we all have the opportunity to be compassionate and, although it can be hard for our ego to admit, surely someone has been compassionate to us at some point. On the contrary, it does not seem nobody remembers that my reward for allowing a mistake was to have been brave enough to not end one of the main chess pieces in the regular way. That implies taking advantages and being more destructive, yes, but also structuring better the already written endgame, so to be quicker and painless as possible... There are some rules and I accept them as long as my opponent (at the board level, certainly someone like you understands the underlying metaphor) does too. The rules are prior to my existence, so I accept them because they can suit and benefit or protect an individual life developed in rough circumstances, and chess allows to be in an equal footing situation to start taking decisions. Also because sometimes there is no choice but to play. Neither the option to change the rules. Because of that, I think that it will always be people ready to take advantage of those who please, even for pleasure... In theory, it seems an egalitarian way to start. Although in practice, as in other disciplines, it's all about practicing, carefully. That's why silence, or some interesting sounds or music, are so important: "to not lose the attention on your practices"... And you know, you cannot be compassionate at the chess board level, because only a king can stand, remember, as a result of the rules... Maybe a king, would knew when to be compassionate, and would hurt his own people if that were necessary for the good of the most, including the opponent. Maybe the same king would need to be a tyrant king as well, knowing when to be one, and he would help his people until the end, even if that means ferocity with the opponent. What good is compassion, without a principle of resilience and a good background to withstand the blows?. Do you think that people will be ready for that at some point or in some way?. It is not better to "hit first" and act compassionately against an already defeated opponent?... "All power carries a great responsibility". If there was something or a place in the mind where to give an account. But, if you do not have it, what is left?. "Just words, sir"... I cannot imagine you, for example, questioning that if the end is already written, what is the point of playing chess?. You know, it can be, for example, try to learn not to be defeated. Or just try surviving the rules. On that way, I think that I have found a temporally method to have a bit of temporally peace: "Block everything, so nobody can move without sacrificing something". And again, the roulette of compassion, takes us to the beginning. Another possible end is to finish with all pieces on the board, including mine. In this way, at the end no one can act on the other and the game remains in tie. I imagine that a king can feel justice before something like that. Can you imagine what a pawn thinks?. What happens when I'm a pawn?. Well, I guess that a pawn tries to imagine that belongs to something bigger and obtains some benefit from it. It forgets therefore the responsibility of the king, and therefore, the power that a king has. Can be compassionate a pawn with a wrong king?. And with another pawn?. Can you imagine what a king thinks?. What happens when I'm that king?. For example, I will maybe feel compassionate again in the next game, and I won't make an "innocent" paying for the results of the previous game removing compassion from my tactics. At least, if I have the possibility to play another game. But, what happens if I haven't that possibility, again?. Strange "game" this chess, isn't it?...

What means 'ethics' for you?

[org: 16/05/2019] [rev: 17/05/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."After Niestzche... without falling into the Nihilism of some schools from classical Anarchism... and being close to the reciever as much as possible"...

Once, at the end of a conference on computer security... at a University in Catalonia, and with the contextual presence of some famous antivirus software companies and other security IT related companies, even sharing the stage, in which they disguise some of their products as techniques or science and try to sell them to the rest of the scientifics-Community, sometimes including a subliminal marketing way... A talk which alluded to certain aspects of the "ethical hacking", questioning its use and how, including the term, has been appropriated, like other symbols and methodologies, from Anarcha/Hacker cultures and from other sub-cultures that have merged from them, or that have gone evolving in parallel to them, like for example, those movements directly related with Transhumanism/Cyboring, or some interesting Malthusianism dilemmas, or even several sci-fi distopic ideas, etc... A common trought in which a possible goal to reach by the governments and several companies, is not only pushing societies into keep a global slavery system going on, but also to build; "a non-directly scary but directly 'smart', apparently futuristic but with an old selfish background, unique point of view for all ideas, technologies and things". A system, for the mind. Ones with an unique rule that goes about only applying cosmetic changes and empty policies to society, every some time, so that "everything changes, but remains the same"... Including also, security industry business, in which for example, some companies are hiddenly selling software to governments and Military Departments from different countries, which is used to deploy massively surveillance systems on an efficient way, and sometimes even including a "defensive related argument" with the implementation that always has some kind of priority attached, of course, required by one of the multiple National Security Departments running, and probably in the form of a public message, that tries to justify a need of resources but using any interesting related task, as an excuse. And that excuse will be fundamentally based and focused into exploit several of the human primary emotional conditions, as for example, fear. So, simply saying that it is an important tool to be used on "war against terrorism" and that the best for the population, in that case, will be to sacrify some of their liberties to apparently have more security, it is done. An Orwellian system that always ends being used against the citizens, even that is paid by them from their taxes and that, from a pragmatic point of view, who never contributes to decrease some criminality statistics, or to increase some citizens safety perceptions markers, on the real life, almost for the poor. A methodology which is used against the citizens but also against possible subversive ideas generated and shared, for/by them. Something that is very typical of totalitarian regimes. And this is done by security companies or companies that contribute to maintain some levels of control but also for other IT related companies, as for example, those dedicated to social networks... Even some political parties, include terms like "hackathon", to attract the youngest, using the subversiveness with which the term had in the past, but that nowadays has nothing compared to the original fact... So, at the end and after answering some interesting questions about the software I had just presented with this particular ideas, at one point I told to one of the assitance that: "the ethics are like the asses, each one has his own". Perhaps, the most intelligent reader, believes that I was wrong and that in reality I was referring to morality. And no, although it is not the same, ethics, in theory, refers to individual politics and morality to the collective... Anarchism says: "Each individual has jurisdiction over their own body". So, from my point of view, ethics are based on emotions and these are directly related with the desire for a type of happiness and the human condition, itself. While the second, morality, which also changes with the years and in other levels of the main conception of what we understand as an individual, refers to accepted collective behavior. For example, during a long period of history, morality supported the burning of people accused of heresy, as public acts, something unthinkable today. Recall also, that according to Roman Law, the judicial system on which the judicial system of today is based, laws must conform to ethics. And my argument is that ethics are defined by ideas and that they all seek some kind of path, towards a certain concept of happiness. So for me, the feeling of happiness, is precisely what makes us all human beings, truly unique individuals. Of course, there are those who try to homogenize happiness, through lying or generating unnecessary needs, something that loves Consumerism because is one of the main engines of the capitalist economic utopia. One more of the layers that, together with the caste system or the aristocracy system, the laboring system and the justice system, that includes the political system and the fact of to vote, suppodesly in order to choose for those that can create laws..., make up, working togheter as a machinery, what we understand as the Establishment. Also we can include to the mass-media and the FUD/shock based doctrine that some are continously applying to the citizens, as another relevant internal part of this big monster, etc. I think it's important to try to understand that Capitalism is only one part of the whole system, but it is neither the only nor the fundamental one, almost in theoretical terms. This can also be translated as a message of proximity, in the open debate between Anarcho-capitalism and Anarcho-collectivism theories, since although both share the prefix Anarcho and come from anarchist schools, their main ideals are practically opposed... Therefore, a common good advice to practice ethics, including those related to the Hacker ethics, is: "...knowing how to share and learn, from the ideas of happiness that you have yourself but also from those that others have and trying to include them in your life, always questioning the cost of obtaining and maintaining that happiness, and having present the fact that supposes to keep an idea during time that includes a perpetual seek for an emotional state of the mind, it is a really confusing meaning of life and probably, a wrong path for a correct self-realization of any individual, if it takes long time"...

A reflexion...

[org: 28/07/2019] [rev: 01/08/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."I think that"...

"I am not afraid of the doctrine of violence imposed by governments, companies, individuals... because I think that I have enough reasons and strategies to deactivate them, at least until they make a new update and I adapt myself and all the underlying mechanisms (related to: mind, common habits, ethics ...), to the new taxation. What really worries me, is the silence of the people who tolerate it, even passively, because their permanent madness escapes all reasoning. Sometimes I think to just hacking their minds or freeing them from the equation. In either case, they are treated as mere simplistic beings with semi-consciousness. I would even risk my freedom to defend their lives, although I might not mix too much with them. Yet, in its united strength is where the solution lies. A beautiful social paradox that makes the unjust prevail and evolve. I guess it is a matter of simply changing that. Don't you think?..."

A contact view...

[org: 30/05/2019] [rev: 18/06/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

..."About myself"...

When some things start, others just finish. Change is the only constant. Almost, in this galaxy. And a tradition, can be a stick in the wheel of change. I feel myself anti-capitalist, anti-consumerist, anti-clasista, ecologist and even anarchist. And quite contrary to everything Anti-. I am aware of the language barriers and for that I need labels to put, hundreds, to give a more accurate perspective, not only about me but also about you and about all. We live in the society of labels that seek to have everything under control, because we are afraid of not knowing things. I know what the game is about. I've been watching it long time. I am a hacker. {Wake up!}. So it may not even be anything like that. Life is a mirror of confusion. And we must deal with some apparently perpetual contradictions. But just do not look at yourself. Or into others. Or even on me, which is the person I better know. The thing is try to not look too much. You have to know, like when you work with the silence, when to look and how. Same to speak. Time is the unique value on this game. No narcissism. Or a bit, but under constact work. As machismo. As sadness itself. Like every human condition. Life is a race of resistance. And although the end is tragic, it is worth participating. Go out and dance when you feel that is a need because life is also to enjoy. Sometimes I lie to protect myself from threats that do not exist. Paranoia can be silenced with a mixture of madness. Sometimes with drugs. But always with courage at the root. No Solipsism. From that, by the moment, I am pretty sure. Ideas and beliefs also change. You aren't alone, almost for me. I always try my best against the frontiers. The truth always ahead. Like the life. Like the love. {Stop!}. Now to speak and to contribute, it is a duty. Let's save almost something. Let's walk towards extinction with our heads held high, at least, saving the planet so that other forms of life can continue. Self-destruction but from a compassion perspective. And I am in several of its phases and other more experimental. I let myself be influenced, as I have also been an influence. And no, I do not say that I agree with anarchism, but I am an anarchist. And I feel proud, not only of being one, but of being able to say it openly to the world, with all the repressive consequences that this may have... From nowadays feminism (also called from "third wave") I have learned, although it seems a contradiction, that language is not so important. But the consciousness that has been generated from it, even if it has been incorrect. Behind every thought there is an emotion and so on. That the barrier is not overcome, putting others. That custom, is the enemy of evolution... Before, if he was an anarchist of purity, he was in communion, for that reason: "an anarchist never says he is, but rather a communion". "Look at me world, I am not in communion with anarchism. But I am an anarchist". The rules are to be put to the test, including those that govern the ideology. How good it is to read every day a little of everything and everything about something concrete. If you do it as something everyday, like someone who pisses in the garden to feel the flat nature, in an outburst to transgress, even, about something as natural and beneficial as it is. Like masturbation or menstruation. But including on that practices also to save water for the rest, for example... Equality. Responsible vital balance. I wish a man could shave his beard to another without feeling any blush. The brotherhood of the warrior. Let the routine be the maintenance of the body, the mind, the common sense and the house. "Children of Hades. It's time to depart Concordia in pieces". How to smile, regardless of the pain with which it is charged, for the benefit of Humanity... Before, I did not think it was relevant to say where it comes from. That it was a burden, of those that labeled you to a site, and that gave too much information to strangers. Now I have it clear. It is important to say it. The context. I'm here, because of my past. I am the sum of everything I went. I am my current self and my past self. But also I am my future self. I am all of them and at same time. I am my friends. And I am my family. And I never make a distinction between them. I do not use social networks too much, nor do I have a smartphone. Even, nor do I have a checking account in any bank. I have nothing with me and everything is close, but buried, hidden or well guarded. I have some solar panels to provide some energy to my non-legal place to life, which I call when the sun is on my smile: "sweet homelab". I am from the Basque Country as a placement reference. Specifically from Bilbao. Although I also owe my being to all the places I have gone through, I limit myself to giving a specific and important piece of information. I am international-list. But I understand that sometimes is needed to use nationalism as a temporal tactic for some kind of warfare. I still believe in Humanity... I was born, along with what is now the cradle of the "bread and circus" of my town, although converted to geriatric and whose name does justice, perhaps not very poetic, "Sacred Heart". I was born in the harsh period, with an open war, lasting, terrible and very very present in the streets, in the trains, in the looks. Between an oppressed people and a decadent and rancid empire. Among a group of scoundrels, prisoners of drugs and many times, no reason, and a people who did not understand certain extremes, certain peculiarities, histories and other emotional elements of the equation. And I was born into a traditional working class family. Where the male goes to look for resources and the female keeps the home and the pot, hot, sickly ordered and with a customary vision in the decoration. Even if they don't know how to love each other. Nothing out of the ordinary, being poor as I still am. I prefer to say that I am rich in other values. Although this cost me to be poor in real life. I do not believe that the middle class exists. As I do not think it is something to say that you are poor, mostly because the privileged society marker is defined by an imaginary, fiduciary and slave value as the currency and its international market. Once I believed that I was middle class, but luckily, I took the reins of my life, starting in squatting groups, with about 20 years old and while I was studying, the mind immediately eliminated it. How beautiful the experience, how it overcomes theory and practice together. It is so, far-sighted, as the enemy's comfort of reason. Let's go, free yourself, normalize it. Hack your mind!. There are no drugs, they are just addictions. Decontrol of the mind-body balance. Balance your being. Make it the routine. There is the right to self-destruction. Honor, if it is not free, is paid high in the spheres of honesty. That, whether or not they govern the existence of a plan, are good forms and Humanity, even though it sounds worn out, still needs values to rework. In the crisis of values, reuse more than recycle, combine rather than single out, add more than subtract and dispose more than snatch. Every offense involves a defense. And if there is violence, mud and our perversion, double will be the chimera and their heads, and the tombs to dig, but it will be done, as has always been done, until a glimpse of perception is observed. It is there, then, that the sovereignty that gives power, putrefied, surely has those heights, becomes a slab that anarchists will know how to discard, for the training that supposes to fight the hierarchies since they are born. And so it will be, distributed, encrypted in a preventive and federated way in your organization. Sustainable, or with assumed extinction. The advancement of the new era. And the devacle of our civilization. At least, as it is erected. I do not want the world to burn, because I love life and all the beings that populate the earth, including fossils or the unfortunate. But I am willing to destroy it in his name. What a vital paradox. I like to be a human... Thank you schools of anarchy for this: "No fear, no limits, no control". For that I fight against control. For that I try to bypass every limit I have. Because I don't want to feel fear, nevermove. One million of masks for all of you. Now I know that I am not alone...

Previous appointments ...

[org: 08/10/2019] [rev: 08/10/2019] by psy [03c8.net]

  • When something is -gratis/nonfree-, you are the product!.
  • The lie has real parts. The truth does not contemplate lies.
  • I prefer to live standing. Than die on my knees.
  • In the future all people will have their five minutes of privacy.
  • Electricity and water always use the paths of least resistance. It is no accident that we are made of those materials.
  • I like it when it smells like: wet earth, storm, hot soup, sea breeze, clay, clean sheet, opportunity, animal baby, incan-east ash and revolution.
  • The best thing about sleeping is; Know how to stop and get up.
  • The worst of death is; That doesn't smile at you.
  • If the lights go out, the shadows come on.
  • Reality does not allow anyone to look it in the eyes, so the reason for understanding it is not enough.
  • A revolution is a matter of attitudes, not skills.
  • Learn to live without technology, while it expands, for when everything is to live with technology and contract.
  • There are no known cases of minds that move objects, but there are millions of examples of objects that move minds.
  • Greed breaks the sack, and greed sews it with pieces of the soul.
  • Who watches the watchman? Ethics.
  • Question everything. And if at any time you don't, ask yourself why.
  • What is the simplest of Democracy? Use it against others.
  • The sky is reached by assault. To hell by invitation.
  • When the country is saved, reason is drowned.
  • Crazy love, hate rope.
  • Fear of evil. And even more, to goodness.
  • The worst nightmares are awake.
  • Who eats the lie is soaked in ignorance.
  • Having to work for a salary is not the solution, it is part of the problem.
  • Who despises life, appreciates death. Who appreciates life, maybe appreciate death or maybe not.
  • When killing is culture, ignorance is the only possible representative hymn.
  • The best path is made on foot.
  • Compulsive purchase, degenerative disease.
  • When you laugh at the politician, the banker laughs at you.
  • There is no worse vital strategy today, than to ignore spending on resources in the way of life, living precisely a way of life based on accumulating and consuming resources.
  • In a well structured organization, the rhythm of the group is marked by care.
  • The habit makes the monk and the routine perpetuates religion.
  • Do not bite the hand that feeds you and if you do, let it be to tear it off.
  • The tree always tells you what branches you can cut.
  • If space looks at us, time does not advance.
  • Sometimes when you think of a person, it is because that person is thinking of you.
  • Compassion is a virtue.
  • Honored people, respected people.
  • If the system disconnects you from nature, it is because nature disconnects you from the system.
  • Nature generates its own technology. It repairs itself. It does not use patents. Its content is Public Domain. And works.
  • They bark later, they don't wear a muzzle.
  • Efficiency is to light the fire by blowing the coals of the previous day.
  • Capitalism offers you what you want, not what you need.
  • Who knows how to die, knows how to live.
  • Sometimes half truth serves as a double lie.
  • Hot water relaxes the mind. Cold water enhances courage.
  • Better poor without working, than poor working.
  • Societies change in a day, when you face and meanwhile, you live on the cross.
  • Spit the emperor for every coin he offers you, only then will he understand who is more powerful of the two.
  • Capitalism creates the present, destroying the future.
  • In hell they staple your mouth to avoid seeing you smile.
  • If I am not in your reality, I will be in your dreams. But I am in your dreams, it is because I have returned to your reality.
  • Wealth lives in the heart. The poverty in the soul.
  • Studies can rid you of many things, except being an idiot.
  • All technologies created by capital, sustain some kind of hierarchy.
  • There are two values ​​that always bristle my skin: dignity and loyalty.
  • In the absence of culture, they are all labels.
  • The style is born of the limits.
  • I am not what you find, when I am what you are looking for.
  • The question is not when, the question is how.
  • I have no hope in the future, the future is chaos. I have all hope in the future, the future is chaos.
  • The only way to deal with a world without freedom, is to become so free that your mere existence, be an act in itself of freedom.
  • There is no truth, without reason.
  • Nothing happens by chance. Everything has a material cause.
  • Everything is impossible. Nothing is impossible.
  • Add and not subtract.
  • The important thing is to never stop asking questions.
  • Any past tense, I ignored the present, looking at the future.
  • It's something, and more than anything, but alone, if it helps.
  • An attitude is worth a thousand words, If it becomes a fact.
  • Any evidence is relative to a relative context.
  • Technology broadens the senses, but it is still the brain that decides.
  • Identity must mutate to the rhythm of memory, but without waiting for it.
  • We breathe to live. We breathe to die.
  • The surprise factor helps to conquer if it remains, and to maintain, if conquered.
  • You cannot defeat an adversary that you cannot see. Victory is not having adversaries.
  • First space, then time. And after cause and effect, a universe is generated.
  • It is easy to locate a single identity, as it is to locate none. The secret is in handling many.
  • Worth it or not, I plan to resurrect in each conscience.
  • In the face of adversity, calm. Before the calm, restlessness.
  • Visibility is contrary to autonomy, except when it must be agreed.
  • Mood is a bastion and perseverance is the tool.
  • The universe sounds and life listens.
  • There is no freedom of expression, but there is freedom of thought.
  • A message in a bottle can cross an ocean, if even the cap resists to its destination.
  • The uniqueness of technology includes dystopia.
  • Be aware, Be balanced, Be healthy, Be happy.
  • Emotional reasoning.
  • Balance ignorance to support emotion.
  • Inert shadows arise from his indecision, windmills that turn to the astonishment of the passerby, hard times to migrate from reason, it is their whispers, which feed my mind, and his words, the ones that disturb my heart.
  • Light of lights that shine and shine, Ténue is useless, if you cast empty hope, and not turned off either, because it means that there is nothing left. Glitter of glitters that shine as bright, You have no use, if you project what you are not, and splendid either, because it means there is nothing left.
  • Clear are the days, when the darkness seems clearer.
  • I will not become part of your cage. Do not become part of mine.