Difference between revisions of "Debate: anarcho-pragmatism and Hobbes"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]]; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but almost until they reach (is not a perpetual problem) some level of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education education] (as individuals and as collective), so it is not a ''static value'' and can be refused when required, to provide more [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty sovereignty] to humans. | In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]]; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but almost until they reach (is not a perpetual problem) some level of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education education] (as individuals and as collective), so it is not a ''static value'' and can be refused when required, to provide more [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty sovereignty] to humans. | ||
| − | Also, | + | Also, they have always the right to decide about the consecuences of their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_action involuntary] actions. |
For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for some problems resolution is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide. | For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for some problems resolution is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide. | ||
| − | Finally, [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a voluntary action) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by anarcho-pragmatism. | + | Finally, [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary action]) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by anarcho-pragmatism. |
Revision as of 03:16, 9 February 2017
In the Hobbes concept; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during Illustration period, individuals cannot complete decide (and will cannot never make it) about collective evolution, so they are substituted by a dictatorship of an intellectual elite.
In the anarcho-pragmatism; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but almost until they reach (is not a perpetual problem) some level of education (as individuals and as collective), so it is not a static value and can be refused when required, to provide more sovereignty to humans.
Also, they have always the right to decide about the consecuences of their voluntary and involuntary actions.
For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for some problems resolution is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an AI) in order to decide.
Finally, participants can entirely refuse (only as a voluntary action) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by anarcho-pragmatism.
