Difference between revisions of "Debate: anarcho-pragmatism and Hobbes"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Hobbes] concept "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illustration Illustration] period, individuals cannot complete decide about collective evolution so they are substituted by a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship dictatorship] of an intellectual [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite elite]. | In the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Hobbes] concept "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illustration Illustration] period, individuals cannot complete decide about collective evolution so they are substituted by a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship dictatorship] of an intellectual [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite elite]. | ||
| − | In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]] theory model; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" | + | In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]] theory model; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" until they reach a level of education (so it is not a static value) and they have always the supreme right to decide about the consecuences of their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_action involuntary] actions. |
For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide about problems resolution. | For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide about problems resolution. | ||
Also [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a voluntary action) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and also is supported by anarcho-pragmatism. | Also [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a voluntary action) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and also is supported by anarcho-pragmatism. | ||
Revision as of 02:48, 9 February 2017
In the Hobbes concept "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during Illustration period, individuals cannot complete decide about collective evolution so they are substituted by a dictatorship of an intellectual elite.
In the anarcho-pragmatism theory model; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" until they reach a level of education (so it is not a static value) and they have always the supreme right to decide about the consecuences of their voluntary and involuntary actions.
For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an AI) in order to decide about problems resolution.
Also participants can entirely refuse (only as a voluntary action) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and also is supported by anarcho-pragmatism.
