Difference between revisions of "Debate: anarcho-pragmatism and Hobbes"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Hobbes] concept "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illustration Illustration] period, individuals cannot complete decide about collective evolution so they are substituted by a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship dictatorship] of an intellectual [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite elite]. | In the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Hobbes] concept "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illustration Illustration] period, individuals cannot complete decide about collective evolution so they are substituted by a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship dictatorship] of an intellectual [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite elite]. | ||
| − | In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]] theory model; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but they have always supreme right to decide about the consecuences of their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary action] and | + | In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]] theory model; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but they have always the supreme right to decide about the consecuences of their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary action] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_action involuntary action]. |
| − | + | For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to some technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide for some problem resolution. | |
| − | Also [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a voluntary action) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes. | + | Also [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a voluntary action) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and also is supported by anarcho-pragmatism. |
| − | In the '''anarcho-AI''' all possible variable scenarios are supported, included those that doesn't want to be included. | + | In short: In the '''anarcho-AI''' all possible variable scenarios are supported, included those that doesn't want to be included. |
Revision as of 02:13, 9 February 2017
In the Hobbes concept "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during Illustration period, individuals cannot complete decide about collective evolution so they are substituted by a dictatorship of an intellectual elite.
In the anarcho-pragmatism theory model; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but they have always the supreme right to decide about the consecuences of their voluntary action and involuntary action.
For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to some technologies (for example, an AI) in order to decide for some problem resolution.
Also participants can entirely refuse (only as a voluntary action) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and also is supported by anarcho-pragmatism.
In short: In the anarcho-AI all possible variable scenarios are supported, included those that doesn't want to be included.
