Difference between revisions of "Debate: anarcho-pragmatism and Hobbes"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Also [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a voluntary action) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes. | Also [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a voluntary action) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes. | ||
| − | + | In the '''anarcho-AI''' all possible variable scenarios are supported, included those that doesn't want to be included. | |
Revision as of 02:10, 9 February 2017
In the Hobbes concept "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during Illustration period, individuals cannot complete decide about collective evolution so they are substituted by a dictatorship of an intellectual elite.
In the anarcho-pragmatism theory model; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but they have always supreme right to decide about the consecuences of their voluntary action and other possible commands to their involuntary action.
A method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for example, is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to some technologies (for example, an AI) in order to decide for some problem resolutions.
Also participants can entirely refuse (only as a voluntary action) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes.
In the anarcho-AI all possible variable scenarios are supported, included those that doesn't want to be included.
