View source for Debate: anarcho-pragmatism and Hobbes

In the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Hobbes] concept; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illustration Illustration] period, individuals cannot complete decide (and will cannot never make it) about collective evolution, so they are substituted by a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship dictatorship] of an intellectual [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite elite]. 

In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]]; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but almost until they reach (is not a perpetual problem) some level of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education education] (as individuals and as collective), so it is not a ''static value'' and can be refused when required, to provide more [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty sovereignty] to humans. 

Also, they have always the right to decide about the consecuences of their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_action involuntary] actions. 

For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for some problems resolution is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide. 

Finally, [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary action]) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by [[Anarcho-pragmatism_model]].