Debate: anarcho-pragmatism and Hobbes - Revision history

Anonimo at 07:09, 13 February 2017

2017-02-13T07:09:43Z

Anonimo at 07:02, 13 February 2017

2017-02-13T07:02:54Z

Anonimo at 07:01, 13 February 2017

2017-02-13T07:01:58Z

Anonimo at 07:00, 13 February 2017

2017-02-13T07:00:45Z

Anonimo at 02:21, 9 February 2017

2017-02-09T02:21:37Z

Anonimo at 02:21, 9 February 2017

2017-02-09T02:21:01Z

Anonimo at 02:20, 9 February 2017

2017-02-09T02:20:03Z

Anonimo at 02:19, 9 February 2017

2017-02-09T02:19:00Z

Anonimo at 02:18, 9 February 2017

2017-02-09T02:18:01Z

Anonimo at 02:16, 9 February 2017

2017-02-09T02:16:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:09, 13 February 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:

	For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for some problems resolution is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide.		For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for some problems resolution is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide.
		+
		+	Finally, [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary action]) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by [[Anarcho-pragmatism_model]].

	This theory can be considered as intellectually [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourgeois bourgeois] but also as a temporal organization method that emerges from some concrete [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_status social status] as another [[pragmatic]] starting point, based on one of the multiple [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/generalist generalistic] points of view of human [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge knowledge] skills (for example, on the current capacity for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpersonal_relationship interpersonal relationships] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanity humanity] self-destruction).		This theory can be considered as intellectually [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourgeois bourgeois] but also as a temporal organization method that emerges from some concrete [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_status social status] as another [[pragmatic]] starting point, based on one of the multiple [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/generalist generalistic] points of view of human [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge knowledge] skills (for example, on the current capacity for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpersonal_relationship interpersonal relationships] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanity humanity] self-destruction).
−
−	Finally, [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary action]) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by [[Anarcho-pragmatism_model]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:02, 13 February 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	In the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Hobbes] concept; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illustration Illustration] period, individuals cannot complete decide (and will cannot never make it) about collective evolution, so they are substituted by a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship dictatorship] of an intellectual [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite elite].	+	In the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Hobbes] concept; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illustration Illustration] period, individuals cannot complete decide (and will cannot never make it) about collective evolution, so they are substituted by a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship dictatorship] from an intellectual [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite elite].

	In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]]; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but almost until they reach (is not a perpetual problem) some level of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education education] (as individuals and as collective), so the ''concept'' can be refused when required, to provide or not more [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty sovereignty] to [[participants]] during time. Also, they always have the right to decide about the consecuences of their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_action involuntary] actions.		In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]]; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but almost until they reach (is not a perpetual problem) some level of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education education] (as individuals and as collective), so the ''concept'' can be refused when required, to provide or not more [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty sovereignty] to [[participants]] during time. Also, they always have the right to decide about the consecuences of their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_action involuntary] actions.

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:01, 13 February 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:

	For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for some problems resolution is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide.		For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for some problems resolution is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide.
		+
		+	This theory can be considered as intellectually [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourgeois bourgeois] but also as a temporal organization method that emerges from some concrete [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_status social status] as another [[pragmatic]] starting point, based on one of the multiple [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/generalist generalistic] points of view of human [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge knowledge] skills (for example, on the current capacity for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpersonal_relationship interpersonal relationships] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanity humanity] self-destruction).

	Finally, [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary action]) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by [[Anarcho-pragmatism_model]].		Finally, [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary action]) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by [[Anarcho-pragmatism_model]].
−
−	This theory can be considered as intellectually [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourgeois bourgeois] but also as a temporal organization method that emerges from some concrete [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_status social status] as another [[pragmatic]] starting point, based on one of the multiple [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/generalist generalistic] points of view of human [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge knowledge] skills (for example, on the current capacity for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpersonal_relationship interpersonal relationships] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanity humanity] self-destruction).

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 In the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Hobbes] concept; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illustration Illustration] period, individuals cannot complete decide (and will cannot never make it) about collective evolution, so they are substituted by a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship dictatorship] of an intellectual [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite elite].
-In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]]; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but, almost until they reach (is not a perpetual problem) some level of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education education] (as individuals and as collective), so the ''concept'' can be refused when required, to provide or not more [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty sovereignty] to humans during time. Also, they always have the right to decide about the consecuences of their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_action involuntary] actions.
+In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]]; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but almost until they reach (is not a perpetual problem) some level of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education education] (as individuals and as collective), so the ''concept'' can be refused when required, to provide or not more [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty sovereignty] to [[participants]] during time. Also, they always have the right to decide about the consecuences of their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_action involuntary] actions.
 For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for some problems resolution is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide.
 Finally, [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary action]) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by [[Anarcho-pragmatism_model]].

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 In the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Hobbes] concept; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illustration Illustration] period, individuals cannot complete decide (and will cannot never make it) about collective evolution, so they are substituted by a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship dictatorship] of an intellectual [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite elite].
-In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]]; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but, almost until they reach (is not a perpetual problem) some level of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education education] (as individuals and as collective), so the ''concept'' can be refused when required, to provide or not more [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty sovereignty] to humans during time.
+In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]]; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but, almost until they reach (is not a perpetual problem) some level of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education education] (as individuals and as collective), so the ''concept'' can be refused when required, to provide or not more [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty sovereignty] to humans during time. Also, they always have the right to decide about the consecuences of their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_action involuntary] actions.
 For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for some problems resolution is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide.
 Finally, [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary action]) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by [[Anarcho-pragmatism_model]].

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 In the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Hobbes] concept; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" elaborated during [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illustration Illustration] period, individuals cannot complete decide (and will cannot never make it) about collective evolution, so they are substituted by a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship dictatorship] of an intellectual [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite elite].
-In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]]; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but, almost until they reach (is not a perpetual problem) some level of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education education] (as individuals and as collective), so this ''concept'' can be refused when required, to provide more [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty sovereignty] to humans.
+In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]]; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but, almost until they reach (is not a perpetual problem) some level of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education education] (as individuals and as collective), so the ''concept'' can be refused when required, to provide or not more [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty sovereignty] to humans.
 Also, they have always the right to decide about the consecuences of their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_action involuntary] actions.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 9 February 2017
Line 7:		Line 7:
	For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for some problems resolution is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide.		For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for some problems resolution is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide.

−	Finally, [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary action]) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by ~~anarcho~~-~~pragmatism~~.	+	Finally, [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary action]) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by [[Anarcho-pragmatism_model]].

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 In the [[anarcho-pragmatism]]; "mostly humans have teenagers mentality" but almost until they reach (is not a perpetual problem) some level of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education education] (as individuals and as collective), so it is not a ''static value'' and can be refused when required, to provide more [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty sovereignty] to humans.
-Also, [[participants]] have always the right to decide about the consecuences of their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_action involuntary] actions.
+Also, they have always the right to decide about the consecuences of their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_action involuntary] actions.
 For example, a method proposed by anarcho-pragmatism for some problems resolution is to give (temporal or not) empowerment to other humans or technologies (for example, an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI]) in order to decide.
-Finally, [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a voluntary action) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by anarcho-pragmatism.
+Finally, [[participants]] can entirely refuse (only as a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_action voluntary action]) to their right to participate and let to others (humans or technology) to organize them as a collective, which is what Hobbes concept describes and is also supported by anarcho-pragmatism.